e the sender
specifically states them to be the view of Global Systems Consulting,
its
subsidiaries and associates.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Fasheh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday,
November 13, 2007 9:09 PM
To: Michael Moody
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.c
Fasheh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 9:09 PM
To: Michael Moody
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-users] OCFS2 and Apache Problem
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 06:18:25PM -0800, Michael Moody wrote:
It's a fairly sizable filesystem, with
n this
message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender
specifically states them to be the view of Global Systems Consulting, its
subsidiaries and associates.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Fasheh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 9:09 PM
To: Mi
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 06:18:25PM -0800, Michael Moody wrote:
> It's a fairly sizable filesystem, with 10's of thousands of little files,
> and thousands of directories.
>
> Also, given as it's an apache server node, the ls -l test would likely be
> inconclusive.
>
> However, I forgot to mention
It's a fairly sizable filesystem, with 10's of thousands of little
files, and thousands of directories.
Also, given as it's an apache server node, the ls -l test would likely
be inconclusive.
However, I forgot to mention it, my stupid mistake, I had this happen in
some of my directories:
p
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 05:43:03PM -0800, Michael Moody wrote:
> This occurs:
>
> pba1 / # echo 'locate <6733855010560701275>' | debugfs.ocfs2 -n /dev/sdd5
> locate: Invalid block number - 6733855010560701275
Ok, I messed up - that log prints the block number as read off disk, which
is clearly wro
This occurs:
pba1 / # echo 'locate <6733855010560701275>' | debugfs.ocfs2 -n /dev/sdd5
locate: Invalid block number - 6733855010560701275
Also, if I unmount, and remount the nfs, should that fix it, or restart
nfs services on the nodes themselves?
Any idea why I see this on both of the nodes,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 05:16:36PM -0800, Michael Moody wrote:
> Actually, yes I am.I have a total of four ocfs2 filesystems, on 4
> different clusters of machines. (www, forum, pba, webcast). Each one of
> these is exported via nfs, on the first node in each (www1, pba1, forum1,
> webcast1)
Actually, yes I am.I have a total of four ocfs2 filesystems, on 4
different clusters of machines. (www, forum, pba, webcast). Each one of
these is exported via nfs, on the first node in each (www1, pba1,
forum1, webcast1), however, I only see these messages on pba1 and pba2.
Thanks,
Michae
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 05:03:41PM -0800, Sunil Mushran wrote:
> No, it is printing the contents of the direntry. Not its location.
>
> You could attempt to manually walk the dir using debugfs.ocfs2.
> But I don't know how many files/dirs you have.
'locate' in debugfs.ocfs2? The values printed are
No, it is printing the contents of the direntry. Not its location.
You could attempt to manually walk the dir using debugfs.ocfs2.
But I don't know how many files/dirs you have.
I guess recursive list dir would have helped in debugfs.ocfs2.
But it's not there yet.
Michael Moody wrote:
Is there
I unmounted the file system and then ran fsck.ocfs2 -fn and saw no
errors and then ran fsck.ocfs2 -fy and again saw no errors. The errors
are gone from /var/log/messages though, so it did fix it. I thought
fsck.ocfs2 not notifying me of errors was odd.
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 16:34 -0800, Sunil Mu
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:23:35PM -0800, Michael Moody wrote:
> I'd love to do that, but, this is an in-production filesystem used by
> multiple apache servers, so if it's non-critical, I can't spare the
> downtime.
>
> Anyone here know exactly what this comes from?
Are you exporting any of the
Is there any way for me to translate the direntries to an actual path?
Michael
Sunil Mushran wrote:
Seems to me 3 direntries are bad. Nothing fsck could not handle.
But I am a bit puzzled by Christopher's post regarding fsck, while
apparently addressing the problem, did not print any error. I w
Seems to me 3 direntries are bad. Nothing fsck could not handle.
But I am a bit puzzled by Christopher's post regarding fsck, while
apparently addressing the problem, did not print any error. I would
have expected it to say something like "Directory entry refers to
inode number that is out of rang
I'd love to do that, but, this is an in-production filesystem used by
multiple apache servers, so if it's non-critical, I can't spare the
downtime.
Anyone here know exactly what this comes from?
Michael
Christopher Sheaves wrote:
I just had an the same error and used fsck.ocfs2 -fy
after unm
I just had an the same error and used fsck.ocfs2 -fy
after unmounting the file system. It didn't identify any errors but my
Invalid dinode errors are gone from my logs.
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 15:15 -0800, Michael Moody wrote:
> I'm seeing a lot of these in my logs now:
>
> (20894,3):ocfs2_read_lo
I'm seeing a lot of these in my logs now:
(20894,3):ocfs2_read_locked_inode:459 ERROR: Invalid dinode
#6540104595874881545
: signature = uY^UoY
(20894,3):ocfs2_read_locked_inode:459 ERROR: Invalid dinode
#6540104595874881545
: signature = uY^UoY
(9524,3):ocfs2_read_locked_inode:459 ERROR: Inv
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 05:32:56PM -0700, Michael Moody wrote:
> I have opened a bug, yesterday,
> http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=928
Yeah - shortly after I sent my e-mail, Sunil pointed out to me that he'd
been helping you out already :) Thanks for putting the info I asked for in
I have opened a bug, yesterday,
http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=928
We were using ocfs2-tools-1.2.2 with kernel 2.6.20-gentoo-r8
I would like to do the backported fixes, I might be able to do that, but
at this point, it's not something I can do immediately (next few days).
I hav
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 09:42:05AM -0700, Michael M. wrote:
> We’re recently running into troubles, however, (switched to the latest
> ocfs2-tools, latest kernel available at time of writing, 2.6.22). We use
> gentoo, so that makes it a little easier to use.
Have you tried any of the backported fi
Hello all. First, I'd like to thank the developers for a great filesystem,
we use it in production every day serving web pages for a site doing up to
400mbit.
We're recently running into troubles, however, (switched to the latest
ocfs2-tools, latest kernel available at time of writing, 2.6.22).
22 matches
Mail list logo
