> SLES9 SP3 did have OCFS2. We've been shipping it since SLES9 SP2.
Incorrect. Promised in SP2, shipped with SP2 + few upgrades after it. Stable
(really stable, not _promised by managers_ but really working, through I
stil don't see stability enough for primary production servers, partially
becaus
On 2007-03-13T11:08:47, Alexei_Roudnev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PS. When working with SLES, don't forget to upgrade. SLES9 SP3 had not OCFS,
> SLES9 SP3 kernel 282 had few OCFSv2 bugs,m and last kernel #283 have a very
> stable OCFSv2 version.
SLES9 SP3 did have OCFS2. We've been shipping it
able enough for production.
- Original Message -
From: "Sergio Lopez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 4:42 AM
Subject: [Ocfs2-users] OCFSv2 in a mail cluster environment
> Hello,
>
> First, thanks to all the people who helped to license
Andy Kipp writes:
> We run OCFS2 for a GroupWise 7 Post Office for about 700 users. The post
> office stores mailboxes (header information) as small database files (~30mb
> each). And individual messages as many small files (~2kb each). In total,
> the file system has about 1 million files i
We run OCFS2 for a GroupWise 7 Post Office for about 700 users. The post office
stores mailboxes (header information) as small database files (~30mb each). And
individual messages as many small files (~2kb each). In total, the file system
has about 1 million files in it.
We have run into some t
Hello,
First, thanks to all the people who helped to license this software under
the GPL. This is a very important piece of work for the Free Software in the
Enterprise Market.
Just a few newbie questions. We've been thinking about implmenting a mail
cluster with a Fiber SAN (IBM DS-4000) and OCF
