[OctDev] [Fwd: Re: Password]

2008-03-27 Thread etienne
- Original Message - Subject: Re: [OctDev] Password From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date:Thu, March 27, 2008 20:57 To: "ultracold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMA

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Hello Sorry for my delay will slow things. If other people will not appear, I will come back to this topic approximately a week later. However I strongly hope that some power users will appear on the octave for windows maintaining activities. Regards Tatsuro --- David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTE

[OctDev] Octave-Forge: boxplot

2008-03-27 Thread Shaun Jackman
boxplot 1.4.1 does not work with octave 3.0.0 for me. If the boxplot does not have any outliers, the resulting plot is empty. The following fix worked for me. I'd be curious to know if there's a more elegant solution. When the boxplot has no outliers, the variables outliers_x and outliers_

[OctDev] Password

2008-03-27 Thread ultracold
Dear Admin! Please provide me with a password for the octave-wiki. Best regards, Julian - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http:

[OctDev] window@(tukeywin,n)

2008-03-27 Thread Laufer, Ralph
I am a complete newbie and was wondering if Octave can interpret a Matlab window function of the type: w = window(@tukeywin,n) and if so, are there any special add-ins needed? Thanks Ralph -- Notice: This e-mail me

[OctDev] Suggested patch to imwrite for Windows

2008-03-27 Thread Michal Fita
Hi Developers! I would like to thank you for your great effort put into Octave development - it is realy useful to have such tool really open and widely available for scientific and engineering work. I attach modified imwrite.m which now works under Windows with ImageMagick (sorry for no patch, b

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-27 18:05]: > >> then the error disappears but I get: > >> > >> warning: autoload: `./fixed.oct' is not an absolute file name > >> > That error seems to indicated that this is not Octave 3.0.0 or later. Nope, I am positive here: $ octave --ver

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread David Bateman
Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-27 12:41]: > > >> If we can do the same under mingw, cygwin and msvc, then I'd suggest the >> attached patch.. [snip] >> > > Thanks, your patch works on Debian for me, at least for the build/install. > However, I am st

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-27 12:41]: > If we can do the same under mingw, cygwin and msvc, then I'd suggest the > attached patch.. [snip] Thanks, your patch works on Debian for me, at least for the build/install. However, I am stiil having a problem at run time: octave:1>

Re: [OctDev] Active octave-forge developers

2008-03-27 Thread David Bateman
Fredrik Lingvall wrote: > avid, > > Please don't remove frli8848. I have just got write access to add an > audio package. I've had the package here: > >http://folk.uio.no/fl/aaudio.shtml > > for review for a while and I will add it to octave-forge in a couple > of weeks. > > /Fredrik > Readded

Re: [OctDev] Active octave-forge developers

2008-03-27 Thread Fredrik Lingvall
David Bateman wrote: > As discussed, I have removed > > cocus > frli8848 > jos > piotrek_d > qspencer > thomas-weber > > If these users want write access again, please don't hesitate to ask.. > > Regards > David > > > David, Please don't remove frli8848. I have just got write access to add an

Re: [OctDev] Active octave-forge developers

2008-03-27 Thread David Bateman
As discussed, I have removed cocus frli8848 jos piotrek_d qspencer thomas-weber If these users want write access again, please don't hesitate to ask.. Regards David -- David Bateman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Motorola Labs - Paris+33 1 69 35 48 04

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread David Bateman
Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote: > Hello > > Although I vote this issuse here again, I cannot have an enough time to > contribute it > at the moment. I have an immediate work on my university activity. > Thefore I cannot committe the isusse at the moment. > Please give a moment to try to build and test

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Hello Although I vote this issuse here again, I cannot have an enough time to contribute it at the moment. I have an immediate work on my university activity. Thefore I cannot committe the isusse at the moment. Please give a moment to try to build and test what David have advised. Are there

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread David Bateman
Michael Goffioul wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 2:26 PM, David Bateman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Ok, then if you can link against the oct-file, then that doesn't change >> anything except the need to add "-L../src -lfixed" when building the >> example oct-files.. I committed another

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Michael Goffioul
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 2:26 PM, David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, then if you can link against the oct-file, then that doesn't change > anything except the need to add "-L../src -lfixed" when building the > example oct-files.. I committed another patch to do that.. Tatsuro, > you'

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread David Bateman
Michael Goffioul wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:54 PM, David Bateman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The problem I had with cygwin is that at the time the example oct-files >> were build it wanted the symbols to be resolved, and thus linked against >> fixed.oct. If the OCTAVE_FIXED

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Michael Goffioul
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:54 PM, David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem I had with cygwin is that at the time the example oct-files > were build it wanted the symbols to be resolved, and thus linked against > fixed.oct. If the OCTAVE_FIXED_API macro doesn't address that issu

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread David Bateman
Michael Goffioul wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:27 PM, David Bateman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yes, but can we do the same with cygwin and mingw? >> > > I guess you can. oct-files are just DLL's, whether you compile with MSVC, > mingw or cygwin. Moreover, mingw and cygwin expo

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Michael Goffioul
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:27 PM, David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, but can we do the same with cygwin and mingw? I guess you can. oct-files are just DLL's, whether you compile with MSVC, mingw or cygwin. Moreover, mingw and cygwin export all symbols by default, so the OCTAVE_FIXED_

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread David Bateman
Michael Goffioul wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:06 PM, David Bateman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yes, but that breaks the use of the fixed type in other oct-files.. See >> the examples directory in the fixed package.. I don't really understand >> Windows builds.. Might it be possib

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread David Bateman
Michael Goffioul wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:06 PM, David Bateman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yes, but that breaks the use of the fixed type in other oct-files.. See >> the examples directory in the fixed package.. I don't really understand >> Windows builds.. Might it be possib

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Michael Goffioul
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:06 PM, David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, but that breaks the use of the fixed type in other oct-files.. See > the examples directory in the fixed package.. I don't really understand > Windows builds.. Might it be possible to flag the OCTAVE_API macro in >

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread David Bateman
Michael Goffioul wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:32 AM, David Bateman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It doesn't have to be.. Under Linux the symbols are exported from the >> oct-file and you can resolve the symbols at run-time from the oct-file >> itself.. Therefore there is no need fo

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Michael Goffioul
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:32 AM, David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It doesn't have to be.. Under Linux the symbols are exported from the > oct-file and you can resolve teh symbols at run-time from the oct-file > itself.. Therefore there is no need for an external library file under >

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Hello David Thanks for your explanation. Regards Tatsuro --- David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote: > > Hello > > > > Please see the long discussions about the fixed package. > > > > > http://www.nabble.com/Creating-library-file-in-fixed-package-for-mingw-to1456293

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread David Bateman
Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote: > Hello > > Please see the long discussions about the fixed package. > > http://www.nabble.com/Creating-library-file-in-fixed-package-for-mingw-to14562936.html#a14562936 > > In the discussion Michael wrote, > My modidication of mingw/cygwin is based on the following Michael'

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Hello Please see the long discussions about the fixed package. http://www.nabble.com/Creating-library-file-in-fixed-package-for-mingw-to14562936.html#a14562936 In the discussion Michael wrote, My modidication of mingw/cygwin is based on the following Michael's advise. The following the 3rd optio

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread David Bateman
Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * dbateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-22 05:49]: > > >> Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson wrote: >> >>> Hey .. it seems that the fixed package fails to build on debian with >>> the following error messages: >>> >>> >> I believe its fixed in the SVN. This was a fail

Re: [OctDev] fixed fails to build on linux

2008-03-27 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* dbateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-22 05:49]: > Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson wrote: > > > > Hey .. it seems that the fixed package fails to build on debian with > > the following error messages: > > > > I believe its fixed in the SVN. This was a failed attempt for a fix for the > cygwin/mingw pl