G.. wrote:
>
> In matlab, prctile(x, p) returns the same kind of vector as p (row or
> column), whereas octave always returns a column vector. I think matlab's
> behavior is more logical.
>
> G.
>
This is not the only problem in the compatibility of prctile.. Consider the
comment in prctile
Eric Chassande-Mottin wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> with the following patch, textread.cc returns an empty
> matrix rather than an error when reading an empty file
> which is, I believe the expected behavior.
> cheers, eric.
>
I applied it.. Since you're looking at this maybe you can see what is neede
Hello,
hist2d.m in the package plot-1.0.4 has the following problems:
(minor) Not all output arguments are defined
(minor) The usage message does not describe the calling structure
(major) the x- and y-axes on the output are swapped.
To see the major bug, do the following:
> x = rand(1e
Rafael Laboissiere schrieb:
> The *clean targets in src/Makefile of the audio package do not follow the
> GNU standards [1]. In particular, distclean removes configure, which should
> be in the distribution. The patch below fixes this.
I made these changes. Thanks for the patch.
> [1] http://ww
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> In the process of building the Debian package for fixed, I found a problem
> related to PKG_ADD. The files fixed.cc, fsort.m, and fixedpoint.m have
> "PKG_ADD:" directives and those end up in the files:
>
> /usr/lib/octave/packages/fixed-0.7.5/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ap
hi,
with the following patch, textread.cc returns an empty
matrix rather than an error when reading an empty file
which is, I believe the expected behavior.
cheers, eric.
Index: textread.cc
===
--- textread.cc (revision 4843)
+++ tex
In matlab, prctile(x, p) returns the same kind of vector as p (row or column),
whereas octave always returns a column vector. I think matlab's behavior is
more logical.
G.
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It
On 01/04/2008, Jaroslav Hajek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Although I have come across the concept of kernel-based methods, I still
> > do not understand exactly what that means. I am an engineer who dabbles
> > in applied mathematics. I do not think the method I have implemented is
> >
