[OctDev] [Fwd: Re: Can you give me access to edit wiki?]

2008-05-01 Thread etienne
Done! -- Original Message -- Subject: Re: [OctDev] Can you give me access to edit wiki? From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date:Thu, May 1, 2008 23:00 To: "Sergey Kuleshov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Etienne Grossmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [OctDev] Add a logdet function?

2008-05-01 Thread Dmitri A. Sergatskov
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Jaroslav Hajek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > logdet (A) == logdet (A, 'general'): [Q, R] = qr(A,0); 2*sum(log (diag (L))) I know I am late for the party, but that looks wrong. Even sum(log(diag(R)) looks wrong (try A=[-1,0;0,-1]). If we define logdet(A) as log of

Re: [OctDev] request to ann octave-forge package

2008-05-01 Thread Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Hello > The octave-forge packages so far use the complier infomation taken from the > mkoctfile script It is easyly to get $ mkoctfile -p CC /opt/octave/gcc-3.4.4dw2/bin/gcc $ mkoctfile -p CXX /opt/octave/gcc-3.4.4dw2/bin/g++ Please read first mkoctfile --help Regards Tatsuro --- Tatsuro MAT

[OctDev] request to ann octave-forge package

2008-05-01 Thread Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Hello In my octave building for cygwin, non-standard gcc was used. So I use export CC='/opt/octave/gcc-3.4.4dw2/bin/gcc' export CXX='/opt/octave/gcc-3.4.4dw2/bin/g++' export F77='/opt/octave/gcc-3.4.4dw2/bin/g77' for octave building. This infomation is included to the mkoctfile. The octave-forg

Re: [OctDev] [OctGPR] Compilation problem with f2c

2008-05-01 Thread Jaroslav Hajek
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:37 PM, Michael Goffioul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I cannot "f2c" stheta.f in OctGPR package. The error is > the following: > > Error on line 62 of stheta.f: Declaration error for mx: adjustable > dimension on non-argument > Error on line 62 of stheta.f: wr_ardecls:

[OctDev] Can you give me access to edit wiki?

2008-05-01 Thread Sergey Kuleshov
Hello there! Could you please allow me to edit the wiki, so I could update this ( http://wiki.octave.org/wiki.pl?Producing_Graphical_Output) article? it's extremely outdated and doesn't work in 3.0. Or someone else could do it, of course :) p.s. please reply to my email, cause i'm not subscribed

[OctDev] [symbolic] Build system messed up?

2008-05-01 Thread Michael Goffioul
Is it me, or is the build system of the symbolic package kind or a mess? I had to make some manual changes to compile it with MSVC: 1) configure.base unconditionally wants GMP, why? It compiles fine for me without it. 2) Makefile uses variables from the previous build system, like GINAC_LIBS, but