Here's a patch that make the video package work with
the recent SVN version of FFMpeg.
Michael.
video.diff
Description: Binary data
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Stu
The zeros are not just a matter of "inconvenience". As seen here,
octave's results for this cdf are not even monotonous (cdf should
always be monotonously increasing). In other words, as you go left,
the area under the curve increases(!).
octave:23> t_cdf (-29,4094)
ans = 3.0609e-14
octave:25
The 0, reported in line 10 below, is clearly not due to an "underflow"
somewhere, because, as you see below, the values go as far down as
10^-247.
octave:9> t_cdf (-26.0,4094)
ans = 5.2275e-14
octave:10> t_cdf (-26.534,4094)
ans = 0
octave:11> t_cdf (-26.6,4094)
ans = 2.6505e-15
octave:16>
Can somebody point me to an careful explanation (for us old folks who
are slow of wit) on how to see the results of the embedded documentation
for a particular package. I want to include the @tek and would like to
see how it's going to look before publishing.
I've looked around a bit and have
man, 12 05 2008 kl. 20:41 +0200, skrev Thomas Weber:
> On 12/05/08 14:52 +0200, David Bateman wrote:
> > Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> > > * David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-12 10:00]:
> > Sorry slight misstatement on my part, from what I've seen with the
> > distributions packaging octave-
On 12/05/08 14:52 +0200, David Bateman wrote:
> Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> > * David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-12 10:00]:
> Sorry slight misstatement on my part, from what I've seen with the
> distributions packaging octave-forge with RPMs the tendency is to have a
> single source RPM w
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Michael Goffioul
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For your information, I posted 3 additional binary packages for Windows on
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/octave. These packages are: ann,
> database and ftp.
Idem for the video package.
Michael.
--
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-12 10:00]:
>
>
>> [...] Also I believe distributions like Debian would prefer to deal is a
>> monolithic tar-ball rather than individual source packages and so even if
>> the individual packages were released independently,
* David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-12 10:00]:
> [...] Also I believe distributions like Debian would prefer to deal is a
> monolithic tar-ball rather than individual source packages and so even if
> the individual packages were released independently, there would probably
> remain a need
Hi,
For your information, I posted 3 additional binary packages for Windows on
http://sourceforge.net/projects/octave. These packages are: ann,
database and ftp.
Michael.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(
Søren Hauberg wrote:
> søn, 11 05 2008 kl. 23:40 +0200, skrev Thomas Weber:
>
>> I'm about to update the forge packages in Debian, but noted something
>> surprising. The control package had no code changes in 2008, but its
>> version went from 1.0.4 to 1.0.6 during the releases.
>>
>> Is this i
11 matches
Mail list logo
