I am rewriting the functions in the data-smoothing package. The code is
done and bug-checked as best I could. I just need to rewrite the help
and demos. If you could give me until the end of the week, that would
be great.
Thanks,
Jonathan
On 8/18/08 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Mon, 18
Hi All,
Since Jaroslav has announced the 3.0.2 release of Octave, I guess we
can prepare for the next release of Octave-Forge. Is there anything that
needs to be done before such a release? Does anybody have code they have
not commited, but really would like to have in the next release?
Unless
> I have verified that
> complex(upfirdn(real(x),h,2,3),upfirdn(imag(x),h,2,3)) gives the same
> results up to computation accuracy errors.
> x and h have been generated as randn values (saved as mat file to be
> common for both matlab and octave)
I've checked in a change to 'upfirdn' so it also s
2008/8/18 David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
> I suppose this happened when ranks was converted for use with NDArrays...
> Though to me the new behavior makes more sense and I'd propose fixing the
> documentation string instead with the attached patch. This should be applied
> to both 3.1.51+
Luca Favatella wrote:
> 2008/8/18 David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Luca Favatella wrote:
>>
> [...]
>
>>> # HELP REQUEST #
>>>
>>> I need help deciding what to add _first_, e.g.
>>> -more texinfo
>>> -constraints
>>> -plot functions
>>> -bitstring support
>>> -subpopulatio
2008/8/18 David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Luca Favatella wrote:
[...]
>> # HELP REQUEST #
>>
>> I need help deciding what to add _first_, e.g.
>> -more texinfo
>> -constraints
>> -plot functions
>> -bitstring support
>> -subpopulations&migration
>>
>
> I'd say constraints, followed by
Luca Favatella wrote:
Hi.
I have Octave 3.0.1 from Debian testing "Lenny" repository.
The ranks function doc says that it returns a _column_ vector, instead
the function returns a _row_ vector.
HOW TO REPPRODUCE THIS BUG
Step #1
If I type:
help ranks
I read:
"If X is a vector, return
Luca Favatella wrote:
> Hi.
>
>
> # CURRENT STATE #
>
> In last weeks I improved the Octave ga (genetic algorithm) package.
> In July it was in bad shape, now I think it is in good shape.
>
> It has only a minimal amount of features, but something as
> ga (@sin, 1)
> works, even with more t
