[OctDev] compiling octave-image with imagemagick

2008-08-25 Thread pierre gronlier
Hi, I just faced a problem during the installation of image-1.0.7.tar.gz under octave-3.0.1 octave:2> pkg install image-1.0.7.tar.gz /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lMagick collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [__magick_read__.oct] Error 1 error: 'make' returned the following error: make: Ent

Re: [OctDev] make erorr ann-1.0.1 on octave-cygwin(3.0.2)

2008-08-25 Thread Michael Goffioul
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Tatsuro MATSUOKA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > I have failed to install some components of new octave-forge release on > cygwin (octave-3.0.2). > > First one is ann-1.0.1 pakages > > Configure > octave-forge is configured with > octave: octave (ve

Re: [OctDev] make erorr ann-1.0.1 on octave-cygwin(3.0.2)

2008-08-25 Thread soren
Hmm, the package doesn't seem to build on my machine at work. It seems to me that the SWIG generated packages have been giving some problems, so if you plan on distributing cygwin binaries, I'd recommend to skip this package for now. When I get home tonight, I'll see if the package builds t

[OctDev] make erorr ann-1.0.1 on octave-cygwin(3.0.2)

2008-08-25 Thread Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Hello I have failed to install some components of new octave-forge release on cygwin (octave-3.0.2). First one is ann-1.0.1 pakages Configure octave-forge is configured with octave: octave (version 3.0.2) mkoctfile: mkoctfile for Octave 2 swig: make $ make make -C ann

Re: [OctDev] Octave-Forge R2008-08-24

2008-08-25 Thread soren
Quoting David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Now that this octave-forge release is done, should we target future > octave-forge release for the 3.1.x/3.2.x tree? If so can I commit > the patch that moves the quaternions, control, and ?? toolboxes into > octave-forge. There are also several ot

Re: [OctDev] Octave-Forge R2008-08-24

2008-08-25 Thread David Bateman
Søren Hauberg wrote: > søn, 24 08 2008 kl. 16:12 -0700, skrev Sergei Steshenko: > > >> http://octave.sourceforge.net/packages.html still points to 2008-04-29 . >> >> > Fixed! > > Thanks, > Søren > > Now that this octave-forge release is done, should we target future octave-forge releas