Re: [OctDev] A plea for a built-in cummax

2008-10-31 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Jaroslav Hajek wrote: > Just out of curiosity, what use is "cumulative p-norm" for? Its the sort of thing someone studying Banach spaces would find extremely normal and natural, and something everyone else would say "huh?" to. ---

Re: [OctDev] A plea for a built-in cummax

2008-10-31 Thread Søren Hauberg
tor, 30 10 2008 kl. 19:08 -0400, skrev Dave Goel: > > Yeah, I can't come up with anything of the top of my head. But I'll make > > you a deal. If you write an m-file version using for-loops, that handle > > the N-dimensional case, then I'll re-implement it in C++. > > I am including here an m-vers

Re: [OctDev] A plea for a built-in cummax

2008-10-31 Thread Dave Goel
"Jaroslav Hajek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > > Just out of curiosity, what use is "cumulative p-norm" for? > Oh, was that to me? As in, why do I want a cummax? There have been several separate issues that all hinged on this recently. The most recent is when I wanted to take a functio

Re: [OctDev] A plea for a built-in cummax

2008-10-31 Thread Jaroslav Hajek
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 12:35 AM, David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dave Goel wrote: >> >> >>> Yeah, I can't come up with anything of the top of my head. But I'll make >>> you a deal. If you write an m-file version using for-loops, that handle >>> the N-dimensional case, then I'll re-imple