Marco Maso wrote:
> I have made some tests. Now when I try to create a BCH code with
> n=262128 and k=261960, with a generator polyonomial of grade 168 I
> receive:
>
> error: primitive polynomial (0) of Galois Field must be irreducible
> error: unable to initialize Galois Field
>
>
>
Note th
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 04:15:50PM +0100, fabio.de.bona wrote:
> Hi All,
> I would like to contribute a MOSEK interface for Octave. For this reason
> I would like to register as a developer.
>
> My sourceforge username is fabiodebona
>
Fabio,
I don't see any problem with this, but the way octa
Hello
Just wondering what is the status of normxcorr2 function implementation, is
it in the latest release of octave? I just faced the situation where I have
need of this function.
Thanks for any help.
--
Vikram
Søren Hauberg wrote:
>
>
> ons, 19 03 2008 kl. 08:53 -0700, skrev George Stelle:
Hi All,
I would like to contribute a MOSEK interface for Octave. For this reason
I would like to register as a developer.
My sourceforge username is fabiodebona
Best,
Fabio
--
Dipl.-Inf. Fabio De Bona
Friedrich Miescher Laboratory
Max Planck Society
Spemannstraße 39, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:40:01PM +, R.N.Palmer wrote:
> The current license of ARPACK is found at
> http://www.caam.rice.edu/software/ARPACK/RiceBSD.txt#LICENSE, and does
> remove the notification requirement.
>
> I agree that making this a default part of Octave, or at least providing
>
The real issue here is what is "tol" supposed to mean? The quadndg
documentation simply calls it a tolerance parameter.
The existing quadndg is relative tolerance=tol, absolute tolerance=0; as
you correctly observe, an absolute tolerance of 0 means integrals with a
value of 0 have no tolerance
Quadndg has trouble with functions whose integrals evaluate to zero.
Quadndg will run though all its iterations and claim the function does
not converge if the final result is close to zero.
Steps to reproduce:
GNU Octave, version 3.0.1
octave:1> function z=f(x); z=0;endfunction
octave:2> quadndg
Debian have already agreed that the new license is free: the ARPACK
library (but not this Octave binding) has now been re-added to Debian
unstable, after being removed when someone noticed the old license's
restrictions a few months ago.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/arpack.html
http://bugs.debia
