Hi all,
deleting leval.cc should be ok. Iirc, it was created mainly for the
optimization functions and has no advantage over feval (funcName,
argCell{:}), now that octave has cells.
If anyone has tons of code riddled with lists, it should be easy
enough to have list look-alike functi
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 01:42:50PM +0200, Michael Creel wrote:
> I checked in a modified Makefile so that leval.cc is not compiled. I
> guess that leval.cc could be removed, but maybe we should wait on that
> (?).
If you think it's superfluous, delete it now. If someone needs it later,
they can (
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Alois Schlögl
wrote:
> Michael Creel wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Alois Schlögl
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Søren Hauberg wrote:
lør, 20 03 2010 kl. 19:36 +0100, skrev Michael Creel:
>
> I think that replacing list with cell arrays is pre
Michael Creel wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Alois Schlögl
> wrote:
>> Søren Hauberg wrote:
>>> lør, 20 03 2010 kl. 19:36 +0100, skrev Michael Creel:
I think that replacing list with cell arrays is pretty
straightforward. I did that for samin and bfgsmin quite a while ago,
>>
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Alois Schlögl wrote:
> Søren Hauberg wrote:
>>
>> lør, 20 03 2010 kl. 19:36 +0100, skrev Michael Creel:
>>>
>>> I think that replacing list with cell arrays is pretty
>>> straightforward. I did that for samin and bfgsmin quite a while ago,
>>> when lists were depre
Søren Hauberg wrote:
> lør, 20 03 2010 kl. 19:36 +0100, skrev Michael Creel:
>> I think that replacing list with cell arrays is pretty
>> straightforward. I did that for samin and bfgsmin quite a while ago,
>> when lists were deprecated. I suggest that the authors of the
>> functions in question ta
