Re: [OctDev] request to register as a developer

2011-04-21 Thread c.
On 21 Apr 2011, at 13:04, w4nderlust wrote: > Hello, > > yes that's the point, and that's why they your and our package are not > joinable. You do the composition piece by piece, we do it all in once with > matrix of membership function values (also our package comes with other > built-in t-n

[OctDev] Gramian

2011-04-21 Thread Juan Pablo Carbajal
Dear all, Attached is the first version of gramian.m It is not very efficient, any suggestions to improve speed is welcome. I have tested functionalities described in the demo section. There are a couple of options to parse, but the basics are there. Looking forward to hear your comments. --

Re: [OctDev] request to register as a developer

2011-04-21 Thread w4nderlust
Il giorno 20/apr/2011, alle ore 19.19, L. Markowsky ha scritto: > > > Subject: Re: [OctDev] request to register as a developer > From: w4nderl...@gmail.com > Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:43:49 +0200 > CC: carlo.defa...@gmail.com; pio.gianv...@gmail.com; > octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net > To: lm

[OctDev] Gramian

2011-04-21 Thread Juan Pablo Carbajal
Hi all, Long time ago a guy named Kyle Winfree, submitted a function gramian.m I was wondering if it was accepted or not at the end (I do not find it in the list of functions). I am about to write a general gramian function (with inner product defined by a handle) and wanted to know if anybody ha