Re: [OctDev] Getting error from rate() function

2011-11-26 Thread Carnë Draug
On 18 November 2011 13:32, Júlio Maranhão wrote: > 2011/11/17 Juan Pablo Carbajal : >> Octave 3.4.3, financial 0.3.2 >> octave:2> rate(30, 510.19, 1) >> error: @pv (x, 30, 510.19, 0, "e") - 1: no function and no method found >> error: called from: >> error:   /usr/local/share/octave/3.4.3-

Re: [OctDev] Package name on function page of Octave-Forge

2011-11-26 Thread Carnë Draug
On 18 November 2011 14:45, Miguel Rubio-Roy wrote: > El 17/11/2011, a las 16:40, c. escribió: > > On 17 Nov 2011, at 11:51, Miguel Rubio-Roy wrote: > > For example, in > > http://octave.sourceforge.net/signal/function/medfilt1.html > > should be indicated that this function is in the signal packag

Re: [OctDev] Authorization to add package

2011-11-26 Thread Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
2011/11/26 Carnë Draug : > As for releases, since the likely users of the package will also be > users of the MOSEK library, I'm sure they would expect it to be > released first on your own website too. Despite this, I'd like to > encourage you to still release the package under a free license. Le

Re: [OctDev] bweuler error

2011-11-26 Thread Carnë Draug
On 23 November 2011 13:43, Adrián del Pino wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Carnë Draug > wrote: >> >> On 22 November 2011 20:53, Adrián del Pino >> wrote: >> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Carnë Draug >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 26 October 2011 16:19, Adrián del Pino >> >> wr

Re: [OctDev] Authorization to add package

2011-11-26 Thread Carnë Draug
On 10 November 2011 16:42, Henrik Alsing Friberg wrote: > Hello Octave Developers, > > I have been developing on a Octave-to-MOSEK Optimization Interface for > a while, and have reached a point where I would like to put it on > Octave-forge and share the package with other users of MOSEK. Though >

Re: [OctDev] octave-forge announcement: non-free is no more

2011-11-26 Thread Carnë Draug
On 26 November 2011 20:50, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > On 11/26/2011 01:13 PM, Carnë Draug wrote: >> Hi everyone >> >> I'd like to announce to the whole community that we will be removing >> the non-free section from the octave-forge project. For more than one >> week, members gave their opi

Re: [OctDev] New optimization function

2011-11-26 Thread Olaf Till
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 08:38:18PM -0500, Nir Krakauer wrote: > This is an implementation of Powell's conjugate gradient descent > method that might go in the minimization section of optim. > > Best, > > Nir I cannot say much to the algorithm, probably there should be no problem adding this func

Re: [OctDev] octave-forge announcement: non-free is no more

2011-11-26 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
On 11/26/2011 01:13 PM, Carnë Draug wrote: > Hi everyone > > I'd like to announce to the whole community that we will be removing > the non-free section from the octave-forge project. For more than one > week, members gave their opinion and it appears that we all agree on > this point. For future r

Re: [OctDev] location of NEWS file in packages for octave >= 3.6

2011-11-26 Thread Carnë Draug
On 25 November 2011 22:58, Lukas Reichlin wrote: > On 25.11.2011, at 11:44, Olaf Till wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 06:21:41PM +, Carnë Draug wrote: >>> On 24 November 2011 18:13, Olaf Till wrote: On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 02:33:25PM +, Carnė Draug wrote: > On 24 November 2011

Re: [OctDev] Fixes to line_min function in Optim package

2011-11-26 Thread Olaf Till
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 07:33:18PM -0500, Nir Krakauer wrote: > I've made a number of changes to line_min for compatibility with the > current Octave command set as well as for more efficient operation. > Please see the attached. > > Best, > > Nir Nir, a few issues. First of all: - Why is 'h'

[OctDev] octave-forge announcement: non-free is no more

2011-11-26 Thread Carnë Draug
Hi everyone I'd like to announce to the whole community that we will be removing the non-free section from the octave-forge project. For more than one week, members gave their opinion and it appears that we all agree on this point. For future reference, here's the link for the thread where it was