2012/3/19 Carnë Draug :
> On 19 March 2012 00:54, Carnë Draug wrote:
>> On 18 March 2012 15:23, Philip Nienhuis wrote:
>>> I tried to update the linear-algebra package as ordinary user and that
>>> proceeds OK as well; so I conclude there's something wrong in the io pkg
>>> setup in the ./src sub
On 19 March 2012 00:54, Carnë Draug wrote:
> On 18 March 2012 15:23, Philip Nienhuis wrote:
>> I tried to update the linear-algebra package as ordinary user and that
>> proceeds OK as well; so I conclude there's something wrong in the io pkg
>> setup in the ./src subdir.
>
> Actually the problem
On 18 March 2012 15:23, Philip Nienhuis wrote:
> I tried to update the linear-algebra package as ordinary user and that
> proceeds OK as well; so I conclude there's something wrong in the io pkg
> setup in the ./src subdir.
Actually the problem seems to be with PKG_ADD as it installs fine if I
re
On 16 March 2012 21:47, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> The following packages have never been in Debian. Please, tell us which
> ones must absolutely get in.
I had forgot about 2 of theses. Do not package oct2mat (as deFalco has
already mentioned).
* oct2mat - do not package this one as deFalco as
* c. [2012-03-18 23:20]:
>
> Does the attached pach improve the situation for you?
Yes, it does. However, the first test block in nrbbasisfun still
fails randomly, like this:
==
assert (B (:, 3),w (3) * aux (2, :).',1e-6) expected
On 18 Mar 2012, at 21:19, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> I have here:
>
> g++ (Debian 4.6.3-1) 4.6.3
> Octave 3.6.1
>
> I just discovered that the failures happen randomly. When I launch them
> several times in a row, sometimes they succeed, sometimes they fail. Does
> this also happen for you?
* c. [2012-03-18 19:35]:
> On 18 Mar 2012, at 18:29, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
>
> > Yes, the package builds fine and most of the tests succeed. There are
> > some tests that fail, though. You will find attached below the output of
> > the failing tests. If you can find fixes for them, it wou
On 18.03.2012, at 11:43, Ahmadreza Saadatkhah wrote:
> I uploaded the m.file.
Thanks! Could you please provide an example m-script that demonstrates the
usage of your function? I could not figure it out/get it working.
Regards,
Lukas
---
* Rafael Laboissiere [2012-03-17 19:42]:
> * Carnë Draug [2012-03-17 15:58]:
>
> > * geometry and mechanics - these 2 packages are new and under active
> > development. I believe it would be nice to package them
> >
> > * dataframe - this is a new package and is kinda handy. I think it
> > woul
octcdf and spline-gcvspl are the only ones of the packages listed that
I regularly use. They can be installed from within Octave, but Debian
packages would be convenient.
Nir
--
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows
On 18 Mar 2012, at 18:29, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> Yes, the package builds fine and most of the tests succeed. There are
> some tests that fail, though. You will find attached below the output of
> the failing tests. If you can find fixes for them, it would be great,
> since we have a tacit
* c. [2012-03-18 15:02]:
>
> On 18 Mar 2012, at 12:32, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
>
> > * Rafael Laboissiere [2012-03-18 12:15]:
> >
> >> [...] I tried to port the nurbs package, but the build failed (this was
> >> reported in this mailing list recently
> >> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.co
Hi Carnë
Carnë Draug wrote:
> On 12 March 2012 19:47, Philip Nienhuis wrote:
>> Carnė Draug wrote:
>>> I have just read that you're preparing a new release of the io
>>> package. I'm right now preparing a new release of the miscellaneous
>>> package and there's two functions that I believe would
I uploaded the m.file.
I doubt if it relate to transformations as this function just calculating
minimal Right MFD from the Matrix system and it's still in the frequency
space.
the function has some bug (not invertible DR) for some not square system
matrix so it'll develop if I can. the idea is bas
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 11:30:34AM +0100, c. wrote:
> >integration
>
> What is the reason for removing this package? Is there anything that needs to
> be done
> upstream to get it back?
While it appears on the current list, it was removed in April last year.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
On 18 Mar 2012, at 12:23, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> Why is the tarball at SF uuencoded (nurbs-1.3.6.tar.gz.uue)?
my mistake, I uploaded that version was prepared for the forum not the
final release I'll upload a new version as soon as possible, but I'd
like to include a fix for the bspeval pro
On 18 Mar 2012, at 12:32, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Rafael Laboissiere [2012-03-18 12:15]:
>
>> [...] I tried to port the nurbs package, but the build failed (this was
>> reported in this mailing list recently
>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.octave.devel/6938). I just
>> saw t
* Rafael Laboissiere [2012-03-18 12:15]:
> [...] I tried to port the nurbs package, but the build failed (this was
> reported in this mailing list recently
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.octave.devel/6938). I just
> saw that a new version of the package is available. I will take a
* c. [2012-03-18 10:58]:
> A new release of the nurbs package, labeled as version 1.3.6, has been
> uploaded to Source Forge [...]
Why is the tarball at SF uuencoded (nurbs-1.3.6.tar.gz.uue)?
Rafael
--
This SF email is
* c. [2012-03-18 11:30]:
> On 16 Mar 2012, at 22:47, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
>
> > <...>
> > The following packages have been removed from Debian for different reasons
> > (buggy, integrated into 3.6, unmaintained or abandonned upstream, etc.).
> > If you heartedly disagree with some removals,
A new release of the nurbs package, labeled as version 1.3.6, has been uploaded
to Source Forge
The main changes from previous version include
* Various bug fixes, most notably a fix for a bug in "nrbexport" that was
causing exported
files to be randomly truncated
* Improvement of the algori
Hi,
On 16 Mar 2012, at 22:47, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> <...>
> The following packages have been removed from Debian for different reasons
> (buggy, integrated into 3.6, unmaintained or abandonned upstream, etc.).
> If you heartedly disagree with some removals, please tell us.
>
>integrati
22 matches
Mail list logo
