The release tarball vrml-1.0.11.tar.gz contains .svn directories that do
not belong there. Please, remove them in the next release.
Rafael
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...
Hello,
I have just posted ga-0.10.0 (SVN Revision 10161) in the package forum
[1]. Please upload it to the server. The changes are listed in the
NEWS file [2]. The main feature is the reorganized unit test suite.
The notice for http://octave.sourceforge.net/ :
April 6, 2012
ga-0.10.0 released
Laurent Mazet's e-mail address from the copyright notice was invalid.
Resending to the new one as on is private page.
On 5 April 2012 22:37, Carnë Draug wrote:
> Hi Pablo
>
> you're using the wrong mailing list, xmlread is in a package and so
> I'm moving it to octave-forge mailing list. I'm als
Hi Pablo
you're using the wrong mailing list, xmlread is in a package and so
I'm moving it to octave-forge mailing list. I'm also e-mailing Laurent
Mazet since he wrote the code in question. I have also edited the
subject line.
On 4 April 2012 20:32, Pablo Mayrgundter wrote:
> But it failed, as
Hi
could you also include the texinfo source for the pdf in the doc/
section? Downstream package mantainers usually require it.
Plus the file doc/README file is out of date as it mentions
directories that do not exist. Same goes for the doc/INSTALL. It also
mentions a Makefile that no longer exis
Hi Pablo:
1- please don't top post, answer at the bottom so others can follow the
discussion more easily
2 -follow-up on [OctDev] mailing list. Please do not "reply all" but exclude
help-octave
Philip
Pablo Mayrgundter wrote
>
> Hey Philip,
>
> Happy to help, though not sure how involved it
queueing-1.1.0 has been uploaded to the package release forum. This is
the summary of changes:
** Function ctmc_exps() can now compute the expected sojourn time
until absorption for absorbing CTMC
** Functions ctmc_exps() and ctmc_taexps() now accept a scalar as
the second argument (time
On 5 April 2012 13:26, Lukas Reichlin
wrote:
>
> On 05.04.2012, at 18:12, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
>
>> On 5 April 2012 12:01, Lukas Reichlin
>> wrote:
>>> Aaah, the Octave Core vs. Octave Forge story.
>>
>> Yes, I wish we could fix this organisational issue once and for
>> all. One of my
On 05.04.2012, at 18:12, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> On 5 April 2012 12:01, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
>> Aaah, the Octave Core vs. Octave Forge story.
>
> Yes, I wish we could fix this organisational issue once and for all.
> One of my goals for this GSoC is to improve Savannah so at least we
On 5 April 2012 12:01, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
> Aaah, the Octave Core vs. Octave Forge story.
Yes, I wish we could fix this organisational issue once and for all.
One of my goals for this GSoC is to improve Savannah so at least we
can make it easier to move both OF to Savannah with little difficul
10 matches
Mail list logo
