Re: [OctDev] GCC 4.7 compatibility patch

2012-05-08 Thread Claudio Freire
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Lukas Reichlin wrote: > Hi Claudio > > Sorry for the delay. May I ask you what the patch does for the control > package? I would like to forward the patches upstream to the SLICOT authors. NP. The new fortran compiler warns about uninitialized access when those "

Re: [OctDev] GCC 4.7 compatibility patch

2012-05-08 Thread Lukas Reichlin
On 30.04.2012, at 01:42, Claudio Freire wrote: > Hi there. > > Here[0] is a patch that makes octave-forge build under gcc 4.7 and > another[1] for openmpi 1.5. > > The patches apply to several modules - if you need it split by module, > let me know. > > The openmpi patch shows undue reliance on

Re: [OctDev] fir1 question on symmetry

2012-05-08 Thread Mike Miller
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Daniel J Sebald wrote: > On 05/07/2012 10:50 PM, James Steward wrote: >> >> On 08/05/12 13:26, Daniel J Sebald wrote: > > [snip] > >>> The above is indicating 5.2057e-01 and 5.2058e-01 for coefficients, >>> but when I list them in long format, why the rounding occur

Re: [OctDev] fir1 question on symmetry

2012-05-08 Thread Daniel J Sebald
On 05/07/2012 10:50 PM, James Steward wrote: > On 08/05/12 13:26, Daniel J Sebald wrote: [snip] >> The above is indicating 5.2057e-01 and 5.2058e-01 for coefficients, >> but when I list them in long format, why the rounding occurs isn't >> evident. The rounding effect will likely show up somewhere