Thomas,
while looking at the discussion about the control package I just noticed this
thread in the Debian Octave mailing list
Thomas Weber tweber at debian.org Tue May 29 17:35:04 UTC 2012:
> Hi,
>
> we removed octave-bim some time ago (it depended on octave-msh, which was
> not installable
On 4 Jun 2012, at 23:56, Thomas Weber wrote:
> Eh no, not quite. We usually look at the errors and decide. But here we
> are talking about a factor of 1 between expected and actual result.
> That's a bug.
As far as I understand from Lukas' explanation, the sign in the result is not
relevant
On 04.06.2012, at 22:46, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 6/3/12 7:15 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>> On 6/3/12 3:30 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
>>> On 6/3/2012 9:45 PM, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
Hello,
in the changelog among other things I've read the following:
"
Add a
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 07:19:14PM +0200, c. wrote:
> Lukas,
> Thanks for your great work!
>
> I ran the tests on OSX 10.6 with Apple's vecLib and get the failures below [1]
> which you already said should be considered as "no problem".
>
> On 4 Jun 2012, at 18:56, marco atzeri wrote:
> > I expe
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 07:42:09PM +0100, Carnë Draug wrote:
> > When do you need the new package?
>
> Thomas Weber asked about it on the mailing list. Since he's one of the
> packagers for Debian, I'll assume he's asking about it because of the
> freeze which will happen sometime this month.
The
On 6/3/12 7:15 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 6/3/12 3:30 PM, marco atzeri wrote:
>> On 6/3/2012 9:45 PM, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> in the changelog among other things I've read the following:
>>>
>>> "
>>> Add a few remarks to the help text regarding the severity of failing
On 04.06.2012, at 19:19, c. wrote:
> Lukas,
> Thanks for your great work!
>
> I ran the tests on OSX 10.6 with Apple's vecLib and get the failures below [1]
> which you already said should be considered as "no problem".
>
> On 4 Jun 2012, at 18:56, marco atzeri wrote:
>> I expect a package test
- Original Message -
> From: Lukas Reichlin
> To: marco atzeri
> Cc: Sergei Steshenko ; Octave Forge
> ; help-octave ;
> Alexander Hansen
> Sent: Monday, June 4, 2012 9:16 PM
> Subject: Re: control-2.3.51 released in package forum - please upload
>
>
> On 04.06.2012, at 18:56, ma
On 04.06.2012, at 18:56, marco atzeri wrote:
> On 6/4/2012 5:37 PM, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
>> On 03.06.2012, at 21:45, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I would not call your ATLAS defective. For various reasons, results from
>> ATLAS and Reference BLAS/LAPACK can differ. Remember that ATLAS
Lukas,
Thanks for your great work!
I ran the tests on OSX 10.6 with Apple's vecLib and get the failures below [1]
which you already said should be considered as "no problem".
On 4 Jun 2012, at 18:56, marco atzeri wrote:
> I expect a package test function to behave reasonable correctly
> for most
On 6/4/2012 5:37 PM, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
> On 03.06.2012, at 21:45, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
>
>
>
> I would not call your ATLAS defective. For various reasons, results from
> ATLAS and Reference BLAS/LAPACK can differ. Remember that ATLAS stands for
> _Automatically_ _Tuned_ Linear Algebra Soft
On 03.06.2012, at 21:45, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: Lukas Reichlin
>> To: Octave Forge ; Carnë Draug
>>
>> Cc: help-octave
>> Sent: Sunday, June 3, 2012 6:11 PM
>> Subject: control-2.3.51 released in package forum - please upload
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've
12 matches
Mail list logo
