Re: [OctDev] no more combinatorics and physical-constants package

2012-10-27 Thread Carnë Draug
On 17 October 2012 13:07, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * c. [2012-10-17 09:23]: >> >> On 16 Oct 2012, at 02:21, Carnë Draug wrote: >> >>> I have removed the combinatorics and physical-constants packages. >>> >>> They had been moved into the miscellaneous package some months ago and >>> since a new

Re: [OctDev] Disable warnings

2012-10-27 Thread Carnë Draug
Hi you have come to the octave forge mailing list. Your query belongs to octave core mailing list. CC'ing it. On 28 October 2012 01:00, wrote: > Hello, > > There are a couple of warnings I want to desable without having to issue > the general command > > warning('off','all'); > > Is there a lis

[OctDev] Disable warnings

2012-10-27 Thread fepa
Hello, There are a couple of warnings I want to desable without having to issue the general command warning('off','all'); Is there a list where I can see what the string identifications of the following warnings? warning: load: file found in load path warning: quadgk: maximum interval count (

Re: [OctDev] complex error function

2012-10-27 Thread Steven G. Johnson
Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: > You can upload your function to the feature request forum > https://sourceforge.net/p/octave/feature-requests/ > > Then we can look at your code and suggest improvements, etc..., if needed. I've created a ticket: https://sourceforge.net/p/octave/feature-reque

Re: [OctDev] finishing up new release of image package

2012-10-27 Thread Carnë Draug
On 26 October 2012 20:14, Lukas Reichlin wrote: > On 26.10.2012, at 20:37, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > >> On 26 October 2012 14:16, Lukas Reichlin >> wrote: >>> On 26.10.2012, at 20:01, Carnë Draug wrote: >> A new release candidate http://carandraug.no-ip.org/octave/image-1.9.95

Re: [OctDev] [bug #37616] holidays result incorrect when New Year's Day falls on Saturday

2012-10-27 Thread Carnë Draug
On 27 October 2012 16:26, wrote: > On 27 October 2012 14:46, Carnë Draug wrote: >> On 26 October 2012 15:24, wrote: >>> Hi Carnë, >>> >>> After more careful inspection, it appears that when New Years Day falls >>> on a Saturday, the holiday is not observed at all. The holidays function >>> doe

Re: [OctDev] complex error function

2012-10-27 Thread Steven G. Johnson
Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: > Then we can look at your code and suggest improvements, etc..., if needed. > > In which field is your function used the most? The complex error function (generalizing erf, erfc, and erfx) is used in lots of fields. We needed it to solve electromagnetic scattering p

Re: [OctDev] complex error function

2012-10-27 Thread Steven G. Johnson
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > On 24 October 2012 23:34, Steven G. Johnson wrote: >> Hi all, in case there is interest I wanted to let you know that I've >> written a free complex-argument error function in C++ with an Octave >> wrapper at: >> >> http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/F

Re: [OctDev] [bug #37616] holidays result incorrect when New Year's Day falls on Saturday

2012-10-27 Thread littlemanrkc
From: Carnë Draug To: littleman...@yahoo.com Cc: Octave Forge Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 8:50 AM Subject: Re: [OctDev] [bug #37616] holidays result incorrect when New Year's Day falls on Saturday On 27 October 2012 14:46, Carnë Draug wrote: > On 26 O

Re: [OctDev] [bug #37616] holidays result incorrect when New Year's Day falls on Saturday

2012-10-27 Thread Carnë Draug
On 27 October 2012 14:46, Carnë Draug wrote: > On 26 October 2012 15:24, wrote: >> Hi Carnë, >> >> After more careful inspection, it appears that when New Years Day falls on a >> Saturday, the holiday is not observed at all. The holidays function does not >> check that, so modifying line 41 wi

Re: [OctDev] [bug #37616] holidays result incorrect when New Year's Day falls on Saturday

2012-10-27 Thread Carnë Draug
On 26 October 2012 15:24, wrote: > Hi Carnë, > > After more careful inspection, it appears that when New Years Day falls on a > Saturday, the holiday is not observed at all. The holidays function does not > check that, so modifying line 41 will fix that (and also allow holidays to > pass its t

Re: [OctDev] new package releases: bim 1.1.0 and msh 1.0.5

2012-10-27 Thread c.
On 27 Oct 2012, at 10:36, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: > The warning is just telling the user that broadcast was applied. > Whether Carlo wants that or not I do not know. It is expected and actually gives a great improvement in performance in the specific case. > @Carlo: In the latest Octave you

Re: [OctDev] new package releases: bim 1.1.0 and msh 1.0.5

2012-10-27 Thread c.
On 27 Oct 2012, at 10:31, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > Well, when testing functions bim3a_osc_advection_diffusion and > bim3a_osc_laplacian, I get lots of this message: > > warning: product: automatic broadcasting operation applied > > I guess they are harmless. > > Rafael Yes, they are.

Re: [OctDev] new package releases: bim 1.1.0 and msh 1.0.5

2012-10-27 Thread Juan Pablo Carbajal
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Rafael Laboissiere [2012-10-26 13:43]: > >> * c. [2012-10-26 01:02]: >>> >>> I posted a new version of bim here: >>> >>> https://sourceforge.net/p/octave/package-releases/9/#5b7d >> >> This tarball works fine, thanks. > > Well, when

Re: [OctDev] new package releases: bim 1.1.0 and msh 1.0.5

2012-10-27 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Rafael Laboissiere [2012-10-26 13:43]: > * c. [2012-10-26 01:02]: >> >> I posted a new version of bim here: >> >> https://sourceforge.net/p/octave/package-releases/9/#5b7d > > This tarball works fine, thanks. Well, when testing functions bim3a_osc_advection_diffusion and bim3a_osc_laplacian,