On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 21:33 +0200, Thomas Treichl wrote:
> Wang Long schrieb:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > Thank you very much in helping me with this problem! The solution in
> > your email solved the problem I mentioned before, but when I tried some
> > other t_in's, for example,
> > t_in_2=[0.00 0.
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 23:01 +0200, Thomas Treichl wrote:
> Wang Long schrieb:
> > Hi,
> >
> > When I was running this in octave:
> >
> > t_in = [0 0.05 0.13 0.19];
> > [t_out, y] = ode45 (@(t,x) x, t_in, 1);
> >
> > I got t_out=[0.0 0.05000 0.1 0.15000 0.19000]. While the
Wang Long schrieb:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thank you very much in helping me with this problem! The solution in
> your email solved the problem I mentioned before, but when I tried some
> other t_in's, for example,
> t_in_2=[0.00 0.10 0.23 0.38 0.63 1.21 1.97];
> t_in_3=[0.00 0.03 0.05 0.11 0.17 0.25
Wang Long schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> When I was running this in octave:
>
> t_in = [0 0.05 0.13 0.19];
> [t_out, y] = ode45 (@(t,x) x, t_in, 1);
>
> I got t_out=[0.0 0.05000 0.1 0.15000 0.19000]. While the
> length of t_in is 4, I found that of t_out is 5 instead of 4. Howeve
Hi,
When I was running this in octave:
t_in = [0 0.05 0.13 0.19];
[t_out, y] = ode45 (@(t,x) x, t_in, 1);
I got t_out=[0.0 0.05000 0.1 0.15000 0.19000]. While the
length of t_in is 4, I found that of t_out is 5 instead of 4. However
the length of t_in and t_out sh
