[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-342?page=comments#action_12448353 ]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-342:
--
Yes, I think linking these up would be a good way to go (ie so that we know
when a Requirement comes from a FixedAssetM
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-342?page=comments#action_12448308 ]
Anil K Patel commented on OFBIZ-342:
Now ItemIssuence entity has necessary field to link to fixedAssetMaint entity.
In certain cases a Part may not be in Stock
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-342?page=comments#action_12439321 ]
Si Chen commented on OFBIZ-342:
---
You should be using the Requirement entity instead of creating this new entity,
as it already supports an entire automated purchasing
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-342?page=comments#action_12438953 ]
Anil K Patel commented on OFBIZ-342:
For supporting the above requirement, There is need for a new Table and then
associate it with ItemIssuence table.
Table