Hi guys,
The forth and worring is that a developer may be forced to use
ofono, as the target device has some closed parts necessary for the os
that does not work anymore if you remove ofono and use FSO.
Please do not post these crazy conspiracy theories here. oFono is GPLed for
exactly
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Denis Kenzior denk...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Then either you're not thinking hard enough or do not have enough domain
experience to really comment. One example: carrier certification. Please
examine what oFono APIs cover and what FSO GSM APIs cover. Hint, to
Hi Morphis,
I am currently working on the implementation of
the basics I found out about the protocol. I split the whole code into
two projects: msmcommd and libmsmcomm. msmcommd is a daemon which does
all the link layer protocol handling which is required to speak probably
Marcel:
-Original Message-
From: ofono-boun...@ofono.org [mailto:ofono-boun...@ofono.org] On Behalf
Of Marcel Holtmann
Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 2:14 AM
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] emit settings signal before active signal
Hi Martin
---
src/gprs.c |
A field 'mpty' is added to ofono_call so that we can know
whether the call belongs to multiparty call or not. According
to 27.007 7.18, it is a defined return value of AT+CLCC.
---
drivers/atmodem/atutil.c |4 +++-
include/types.h |1 +
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1
Hi Yang,
looks good so far, but ...
+static gboolean check_terminator(struct terminator_info *info, char
*line)
+{
+ if ((info-len == -1 !strcmp(line, info-terminator)) ||
+ (info-len 0 !strncmp(line, info-terminator,
info-len)))
+ return TRUE;
+
