Re: [PATCH 1/2] sim: fix minor issue in ofono_sim_get_phase

Hi Jeevaka, On 12/06/2010 12:39 PM, Jeevaka Badrappan wrote: --- src/sim.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Patch has been applied, thanks. Regards, -Denis ___ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org

Re: [PATCH 2/2] simfs: Add unknown sim phase check

Hi Jeevaka, On 12/06/2010 12:39 PM, Jeevaka Badrappan wrote: --- src/simfs.c |9 - 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Patch has been applied, thanks. Regards, -Denis ___ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org

RE: [PATCH 0/5] Call Counters (2nd)

Hello Marcel, I'll answer to two separates mails (of this thread) in one go: On 10 Dec 2010, Marcel Holtmann wrote: Kai Vehmanen wrote: So whether this code is in oFono or elsewhere, does not matter much (to overall power consumption). The main question is of course how often the counters

RE: [PATCH] ifx: adding Infineon modem self test

The conclusion was that these two test commands should be issued from the AP to ensure that the modem is functioning properly. I am not aware of the conclusion. My understanding is still that the modem firmware is suppose to do its selftests all by itself. It does not. So what is the

RE: [PATCH] ifx: adding Infineon modem self test

Hi Waldo, The conclusion was that these two test commands should be issued from the AP to ensure that the modem is functioning properly. I am not aware of the conclusion. My understanding is still that the modem firmware is suppose to do its selftests all by itself. It does not.

Re: [PATCH] ifx: adding Infineon modem self test

Hi Robertino, static const char *none_prefix[] = { NULL }; static const char *xdrv_prefix[] = { +XDRV:, NULL }; +static const char *empty_prefix[] = { , NULL }; this is essentially to just passing NULL as argument. What are you trying to achieve here? +static const char

[PATCH] test-stkutil: Modify the check logic of time zone

--- unit/test-stkutil.c |6 +- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/unit/test-stkutil.c b/unit/test-stkutil.c index 868d54b..666f4eb 100644 --- a/unit/test-stkutil.c +++ b/unit/test-stkutil.c @@ -245,7 +245,11 @@ static void check_gsm_sms(const struct sms

RE: [PATCH 0/5] Call Counters (2nd)

Hello, On 11 Dec 2010, Denis-Courmont Remi wrote: let me repeat my question here. Does this suppose to be represent spent time on calls (what I called talk time) or actual billing minutes. As said earlier, this is about the talk time. The scenario is a user ejects the battery during an