Adding Features

Hi, I have a simple question. How easy it is to add a new feature into oFono say something like video telephony ??? Regards, Rishi ___ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono

Re: [PATCH] call-forwarding: fix for showing call forwarding states

Hi Jussi, On 03/14/2011 08:47 AM, Jussi Kangas wrote: > > Hi Denis, > > On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 00:48 +0200, Denis Kenzior wrote: >>> + } else { >>> + DBG("append only unconditional"); >>> + property_append_cf_conditions(&dict, >>> + cf->cf_conditions[CALL_

Re: [PATCH] PPP: Switch ringbuffer.c to g_slice allocator

Hi Patrick, On 03/16/2011 04:24 AM, Patrick Porlan wrote: > This should allow for more efficient handling of equally sized > buffers, in terms of alignment and recycling. > --- > gatchat/ringbuffer.c |8 > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > Patch has been applied, t

Re: [PATCH 1/1] stk: fix issue with Get Inkey variable timeout

Hi Jeevaka, On 03/16/2011 12:57 PM, Jeevaka Badrappan wrote: > --- > src/stk.c | 28 ++-- > 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > Patch has been applied, thanks. Regards, -Denis ___ ofono mailing list ofono@ofo

Re: [PATCH] CBMs are always fixed size, so improve PDU length check

Hi Bertrand, On 03/16/2011 04:12 AM, Bertrand Aygon wrote: > --- > drivers/atmodem/cbs.c |4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > Patch has been applied, thanks. Regards, -Denis ___ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://l

Re: IMS support plan

Hi Michael, On 03/16/2011 02:34 PM, Fallon, Michael F wrote: > Hello, > > > > Can anybody provide any insight into oFono’s plans to support IMS (ISIM > interface)? I’m particularly interested in feature set and scheduling > details if this information is available. Will ISIM support be include

IMS support plan

Hello, Can anybody provide any insight into oFono's plans to support IMS (ISIM interface)? I'm particularly interested in feature set and scheduling details if this information is available. Will ISIM support be included in MeeGo 1.2? Thank you! ___

[PATCH 1/1] stk: fix issue with Get Inkey variable timeout

--- src/stk.c | 28 ++-- 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/stk.c b/src/stk.c index e933e4e..68b6240 100644 --- a/src/stk.c +++ b/src/stk.c @@ -1396,7 +1396,19 @@ static void request_confirmation_cb(enum stk_agent_result result,

[PATCH 0/1] Fixes issue with Get Inkey variable timeout

Hi, As per the ETSI TS 102 384 specification 27.22.4.2.8 section, duration data object needs to be sent as part of the Get Inkey terminal response for "No response from user" result. Regards, Jeevaka Jeevaka Badrappan (1): stk: fix issue with Get Inkey variable timeout src/stk.c | 28

Re: [RESEND 3 PATCH 00/13] IPv6 Support

Hi Mika, On 03/16/2011 05:45 AM, mika.liljeb...@nokia.com wrote: > Hi Denis, > >> So during OSTS Samuel, Marcel and I sat down and tried to >> figure out the >> IPv6 stuff. Based on this discussion and your implementation >> I pushed a >> series of patches implementing IPv6 and dual-stack cont

RE: [RESEND 3 PATCH 00/13] IPv6 Support

Hi Mika, > > So during OSTS Samuel, Marcel and I sat down and tried to > > figure out the > > IPv6 stuff. Based on this discussion and your implementation > > I pushed a > > series of patches implementing IPv6 and dual-stack contexts. I have > > taken (and later re-worked) some of your patches

RE: [RESEND 3 PATCH 00/13] IPv6 Support

Hi Denis, > So during OSTS Samuel, Marcel and I sat down and tried to > figure out the > IPv6 stuff. Based on this discussion and your implementation > I pushed a > series of patches implementing IPv6 and dual-stack contexts. I have > taken (and later re-worked) some of your patches so you get

[PATCH] PPP: Switch ringbuffer.c to g_slice allocator

This should allow for more efficient handling of equally sized buffers, in terms of alignment and recycling. --- gatchat/ringbuffer.c |8 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/gatchat/ringbuffer.c b/gatchat/ringbuffer.c index 27be3a8..775498c 100644 --- a/gatc

[PATCH] CBMs are always fixed size, so improve PDU length check

--- drivers/atmodem/cbs.c |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/atmodem/cbs.c b/drivers/atmodem/cbs.c index 8cc3ef0..e2e1ca4 100644 --- a/drivers/atmodem/cbs.c +++ b/drivers/atmodem/cbs.c @@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ static void at_cbm_notify(GAtResult *result, g

Re: [PATCH] PPP: Optimize write buffer management

Hi Denis, On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 14:28 -0500, Denis Kenzior wrote: > Since we're dealing with MTUs of ~1500, our frames don't really ever > exceed it. So 256 byte overhead is probably ok, but might be worth > checking if making this dynamic buys us anything. Sounds like a good idea. We can expec