Hi Denis, 2013/1/24 Denis Kenzior
> Hi Anthony, > > On 01/24/2013 11:13 AM, Viallard Anthony wrote: > >> On 24. 01. 13 17:21, Denis Kenzior wrote: >> >> How closely related is this one to SIMCOM 900? We already do have a >>> plugin for it in the tree, so it might be a good idea to merge the two >>> if they are closely related. >>> >> In near time I'll begin rework plugin for SIM900 . I'll want replace external cmux with the internal oFono gatmux, and add GPRS. But I think merge is possible. Only one question is actual to me - we use voice calls in SIM900, and during merge this functionality must be saved. > >> I don't known if SIM900 works with my driver plugin. SIMCOM were not >> given us this information whereas we inquired them. It will be glad if >> someone check it. >> > Ok, I can check your plugin with SIM900 in near time. > >> The only main difference i see between the two plugins, it's the >> AT+CSCS="GSM" command. I don't exactly why there is this command. Maybe >> its a behavior need it to work correctly with the operator where the guy >> has wrote the code and done the test. If someone tell me how to check >> (with an AT command ?) if we need this command, I will do the job. >> >> > If this is the only difference then the two plugins should be merged. Any > minor variations can be taken care of by checking the model / firmware > versions. > > The CSCS command is used to set the character set. It is mostly used to > make sure basic strings from the modem will be in a format we recognize > (e.g. phone numbers, operator names, etc). This setting should generally > be safe. > >From SIM900 AT command manual: "The SIM900 AT Command interface defaults to the IRA character set.", so we use AT+CSCS="GSM" for compatibility with settings of our provider. > * I would like to do a reset of the modem at start and at end of ofono >>>> life (with AT+CFUN=6 or AT+CRESET). The purpose is having a modem always >>>> in init state for ofono and the others programs. Do you think its a good >>>> idea ? >>>> >>>> >>> In general that is not desirable. The modem should be initialized when >>> the enable driver method is called. Why do you want to do this? >>> >> >> I guessed it will be nicer to have this but if you say no, ok, it was >> just an idea to have always a chips in same state at start and when >> ofono stops. >> >> > The chip should be powered down in disable(), so in theory it will be in > the same state prior to oFono starting. Maybe I'm mis-understanding what > you're trying to do. > > Regards, > -Denis > ______________________________**_________________ > ofono mailing list > ofono@ofono.org > http://lists.ofono.org/**listinfo/ofono<http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono> > Best regards, Renat Zaripov
_______________________________________________ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
