[PATCH 01/18] gisi: pipe and pep for wgmodem2.5

2011-02-15 Thread Andreas Westin
From: Jessica Nilsson --- gisi/message.c |8 ++ gisi/message.h |1 + gisi/modem.c | 20 gisi/modem.h |1 + gisi/pep.c | 330 gisi/pep.h |6 + gisi/pipe.c| 180 -- gisi/pi

Re: [PATCH 01/18] gisi: pipe and pep for wgmodem2.5

2011-02-15 Thread Rémi Denis-Courmont
On Tuesday 15 February 2011 14:30:55 ext Andreas Westin, you wrote: > From: Jessica Nilsson I don't understand why you put a pipe controller in user-space. Why do we need a pipe controller at all? As far as I can tell, implementing connect() on PEP sockets would be much more elegant (and symmet

RE: [PATCH 01/18] gisi: pipe and pep for wgmodem2.5

2011-02-15 Thread Mika.Liljeberg
> As far as I can tell, implementing > connect() on PEP > sockets would be much more elegant (and symmetric). Lacking better things to do, that's something we (= you) could push upstream? MikaL ___ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lis

Re: [PATCH 01/18] gisi: pipe and pep for wgmodem2.5

2011-02-16 Thread Andreas WESTIN
On 2011-02-15 14:23, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: On Tuesday 15 February 2011 14:30:55 ext Andreas Westin, you wrote: From: Jessica Nilsson I don't understand why you put a pipe controller in user-space. Why do we need a pipe controller at all? As far as I can tell, implementing connect() on PE

Re: Fwd: [PATCH 01/18] gisi: pipe and pep for wgmodem2.5

2012-08-21 Thread Kumar SANGHVI
Hi, > > As far as I can tell, implementing > > connect() on PEP > > sockets would be much more elegant (and symmetric). > Sorry, I am not aware of the oFono. However, I was just wondering that enabling Pipe Controller in Phonet stack should suffice. Pipe controller in Phonet stack already implem