Hey,
Given there's been little or no comment for 14 days, it looks like we need to
meet to approve this proposal. Do we hold off until the 31st when we have a
scheduled meeting, or organize something before that?
Glynn
Stephen Lau wrote:
> Ray Strong wrote:
>> The following is a proposal for a
[Removed internal mailing list incorrectly copied on external email.]
Ray Strong writes:
> James Carlson wrote:
> > Glynn Foster writes:
> >
> >> Given there's been little or no comment for 14 days, it looks like we need
> >> to
> >> meet to approve this proposal. Do we hold off until the 31st
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 12:23:44PM +1300, Glynn Foster wrote:
>
>
>> I think giving them the benefit of the doubt until they prove otherwise seems
>> like the right approach to me, and being available to give them guidance
>> whenever they need it.
>>
>
> All rig
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 12:23:44PM +1300, Glynn Foster wrote:
> I think giving them the benefit of the doubt until they prove otherwise seems
> like the right approach to me, and being available to give them guidance
> whenever they need it.
All right. I'm still not comfortable with this, but it
On Oct 24, 2007, at 15:55, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
> As was I, although I'm disturbed to see additional evidence that this
> is an item appearing on anyone's schedule or being monitored by
> program managers.
Can you explain why, please?
S.
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:17:33PM -0600, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
>
>>> As was I, although I'm disturbed to see additional evidence that this
>>> is an item appearing on anyone's schedule or being monitored by
>>> program managers.
>>>
>> Can you explain why, ple
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:17:33PM -0600, Simon Phipps wrote:
> > As was I, although I'm disturbed to see additional evidence that this
> > is an item appearing on anyone's schedule or being monitored by
> > program managers.
>
> Can you explain why, please?
I believe some Community Groups forme
Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:22:44PM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
>
>
>> I doubt we'll be able to do that, as the last time we tried to do this
>> by email or on short notice, we failed. OGB votes require quorum.
>>
>> On the plus side, I'm inclined to vote for it.
>>
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:51:02AM +1300, Glynn Foster wrote:
> > [Removed internal mailing list incorrectly copied on external email.]
> >
> >> It would be great to have an answer by COB today as we have a PMT preso
> >> tomorrow on this subject.
> >
> > I doubt we'll be able to do that, as th
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:22:44PM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
> I doubt we'll be able to do that, as the last time we tried to do this
> by email or on short notice, we failed. OGB votes require quorum.
>
> On the plus side, I'm inclined to vote for it.
As was I, although I'm disturbed to see
---
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/attachments/20071024/a2a17a1b/attachment.html>
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, James Carlson wrote:
> Glynn Foster writes:
>> Given there's been little or no comment for 14 days, it looks like we need to
>> meet to approve this proposal. Do we hold off until the 31st when we have a
>> scheduled meeting, or organize something before that?
>
> A short call
Ray,
Would the the scope of this community include various thin client
technologies like RDP, Citrix, and X-Terminals?
Thanks,
Brian
On 10/1/07, Ray Strong wrote:
>
> The following is a proposal for a Virtual Client Community on
> opensolaris.org.
>
> Name:
> Virtual Client
>
> Background:
Glynn Foster writes:
> Given there's been little or no comment for 14 days, it looks like we need to
> meet to approve this proposal. Do we hold off until the 31st when we have a
> scheduled meeting, or organize something before that?
A short call today would be fine with me. I see no reason to m
14 matches
Mail list logo
