Michael Cortez wrote:
But this does not "close" the door on the existing material, existing
OGC will still be usable under version 1.0 {and possibly under 2.0.}
I don't think that's possible, Mike. I mean, closing the door. What's
OGC now will remain OGC forever--well, at least until WotC's
Don't pester Andy. He's busy making more OGC for us to use. :)
Besides, I'm partial to those with the name 'Andrew' :p
Andrew McDougall
a.k.a. Tir Gwaith
>
> Not to be pushy, but I am curious if plans have changed with AV now no
> longer working for WotC.
>
> On April 28, AV posted here (
> ht
In a message dated 5/28/03 5:26:08 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You create a new term, "Open Game Material" under an OGL 2.0 -- define
it very similar to OGC, perhaps fixing some of the "issues" people have
with that laundry list at the same time, and then restrict it's use
>> Does anyone else share this particular reading of paragraph 9,
>> that material explicitly declared under OGL 2.0
>> as "Open Game Content" in fact would not necessarily be reprinted
>> under "any version" of the OGL?
Although I don't agree directly, I do agree indirectly.
You create a new
In a message dated 5/28/03 1:00:15 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<<> "9. Updating the License: Wizards or its designated Agents may publish
> updated versions of this License. You may use any authorized version
> of this License to copy, modify and distribute any Open Game
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only for d20 licensed products. Anyone else could use whatever OGL
version they wanted regardless of when any new IP was released.
"9. Updating the License: Wizards or its designated Agents may publish
updated versions of this License. You may use any authorized versio
In a message dated 5/28/03 12:16:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thought about it. Doesn't work, chief, at least not for the intended
purpose of mandating that everybody use new rules and regulations in
OGL 2.0. Your method only works for d20 licensed products.
Actually, if the hypothetical OGL 2.0 mandated that any derivitive work
