Re: [Ogf-l] Two versions of the same work with and without the d20 license?

2004-05-24 Thread Tavis Allison
"Staggeringly bad idea" ought to be enough for me to talk my fellow Behemoths out of using the d20 license for Masters and Minions. However, I think it's possible that others might benefit from carrying the idea further, especially since bad ideas are often the most instructive. Let's assum

Re: [Ogf-l] Re: [Offlist] Setting replies to ogf-l only?

2004-05-24 Thread Bruce Baugh
On May 24, 2004, at 4:18 AM, Tavis Allison wrote: In trying to fix one beach of netiquette, I've obviously committed a much graver one. Nah, that just means you've arrived, baby! :) Seriously, though, I don't know. It's possible that specifying the reply-to as a general thing is what's doing it,

[Ogf-l] Re: [Offlist] Setting replies to ogf-l only?

2004-05-24 Thread Tavis Allison
Tavis Allison wrote: Bruce - *snip In trying to fix one beach of netiquette, I've obviously committed a much graver one. I hope the list, and especially Bruce, will acept my sincerest apologies--no one whose computer is within reach of a two-year-old should have allowed email to be sent immediat

[Ogf-l] [Offlist] Setting replies to ogf-l only?

2004-05-24 Thread Tavis Allison
Bruce - I apologize for the slip in netiquette! I'd like to apologize publicly on the list as well, but first I want to make sure I've fixed the problem. Could my mistake have been specifying a "reply to" address in my email client rather than leaving that field blank? I assume that my reply-to