- Original Message -
From: "woodelf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 4:35 AM
> At 5:50 +0100 7/30/04, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Oh, I thought he wanted a general idea of what was new. If he does
> >want a PDF version of
> >the 3.5, there is already a 3.5 SRD PDF dow
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Brink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 3:00 PM
> My question is simply, does a licensee have a contractual relation
> with all contributors listed in an OGL's section 15 or only with the
> licensor which's work the licensee has made use
At 13:02 -0400 8/1/04, Doug Meerschaert wrote:
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 08:42:47 -0500, woodelf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, personally, i'm about ready to give up on these discussions. The
license is broken, perhaps fatally.
If the license were broken, it wouldn't be used. It is used; ergo, it
not
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So, while I may agree that the license, is "good enough" for the current environment
> and
> attitudes, I think it has some major flaws if it's put under close scrutiny (such as
> would
> happen during litigation). I'v
At 07:21 PM 8/1/2004 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Replying to two folks in one post --
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<>
I wholly disagree. I think that's an exactly wrong interpretation.
You are correct. I was replying to the PI question but then broadened my
example beyond PI erroneously. I was t
Replying to two folks in one post --
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
I wholly disagree. I think that's an exactly wrong
interpretation.
The license notes that: "All sublicenses shall
In a message dated 8/1/2004 1:03:44 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
Please. That's a flawed premise. Do you know how many utterly
faulty and terminally flawed contracts are used in America at any
I don't think the license is as much if an issuse as the varying use of PI.
I'm not placing judgement on companies for using it, it's just IMO it
hinders the potential of open game content. It's partly why I went with the
nonprofit option. I couldn't figure out how to make a for profit company
su
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 17:56:33 +0200, Peter Brink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is nothing in section 4 that gives me any reason to believe that
> the other contributors grants the licensee the right to issue a new
> license *in their name*.
No, there isn't. But the other contributors gave a
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 08:42:47 -0500, woodelf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, personally, i'm about ready to give up on these discussions. The
> license is broken, perhaps fatally.
If the license were broken, it wouldn't be used. It is used; ergo, it
not only isn't broken, but it doesn't even rea
At 13:03 +0200 8/1/04, Peter Brink wrote:
On Sunday, August 01, 2004 4:01 AM,
Doug Meerschaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 16:00:25 +0200, Peter Brink
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What does the list say?
Collectively? "Hire a lawyer."
That is probably good advice :-), but isn'
On Sunday, August 01, 2004 3:58 PM,
Doug Meerschaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Brink wrote:
>
>> That is probably good advice :-), but isn't this particular
question
>> so central to the use of OGL that there ought to be a good and
known
>> answer to it?
>>
>>
> Not in my opinion. Whether
Peter Brink wrote:
That is probably good advice :-), but isn't this particular question
so central to the use of OGL that there ought to be a good and known
answer to it?
Not in my opinion. Whether you have many licenses between everyone in
your chain or just your immediate origin is only rele
Well,
Originally the SRD was in 'Draft' form. This document while
mostly similar, had things that have been removed or changed, such as Mind
Flayers and any of the Spell names that had Mordenkeinen in them (they were Mord
in the draft version). The draft version of the SRD has long since
On Sunday, August 01, 2004 4:01 AM,
Doug Meerschaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 16:00:25 +0200, Peter Brink
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> What does the list say?
>
> Collectively? "Hire a lawyer."
That is probably good advice :-), but isn't this particular question
so c
I often notice the following text on the lawyer's page of OGL
publications, whether or not they also use the d20STL:
"[This work is] produced
and distributed under version 1.0a of the Open Game License and draft versions
of the System Reference Document by permission of Wizards of
16 matches
Mail list logo
