> The frustration comes from the no-return-contact
> part...
I hear you on that.
Clark
=
http://www.necromancergames.com
"3rd Edition Rules, 1st Edition Feel"
___
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/l
cts, including two recent releases,
so it feels like an intentional blow-off (and probably is).
~Jimmy Domsalla
qtgg.icehex.net
- Original Message -
From: "Clark Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 1:29 PM
Subject: Re:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, jdomsalla wrote:
A source I'm drawing from has the following S15 entry:
[Product Name] and the above designated Product Identity are Copyright
[Year], [Publisher].
Now, is it just me, or is there a problem with putting this line into my
material? After all, the "above d
> You'd still be in breach of the license; morally
> right, but legally
> wrong.
Morally right? Really...that's debatable.
Clark
=
http://www.necromancergames.com
"3rd Edition Rules, 1st Edition Feel"
___
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:/
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, jdomsalla wrote:
> A source I'm drawing from has the following S15 entry:
>
> [Product Name] and the above designated Product Identity are Copyright
> [Year], [Publisher].
>
> Now, is it just me, or is there a problem with putting this line into my
> material? After all, th
