Re: [Ogf-l] Paragraph 9 and Revision of the OGL

2003-05-29 Thread Doug Meerschaert
Michael Cortez wrote: But this does not "close" the door on the existing material, existing OGC will still be usable under version 1.0 {and possibly under 2.0.} I don't think that's possible, Mike. I mean, closing the door. What's OGC now will remain OGC forever--well, at least until WotC's

Re: [Ogf-l] Paragraph 9 and Revision of the OGL

2003-05-29 Thread HUDarklord
In a message dated 5/28/03 5:26:08 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You create a new term, "Open Game Material" under an OGL 2.0 -- define it very similar to OGC, perhaps fixing some of the "issues" people have with that laundry list at the same time, and then restrict it's use

RE: [Ogf-l] Paragraph 9 and Revision of the OGL

2003-05-29 Thread Michael Cortez
>> Does anyone else share this particular reading of paragraph 9, >> that material explicitly declared under OGL 2.0 >> as "Open Game Content" in fact would not necessarily be reprinted >> under "any version" of the OGL? Although I don't agree directly, I do agree indirectly. You create a new