On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 13:48, Mikael wrote:
> If I DO include content in my derived work that is identical to any
> declared PI in the work I derive from, I need to be able to point to
> another source, outside of the work I've derived from.
You need to be careful.
It is possible that the 3rd par
In a message dated 7/23/03 4:57:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<>
I'm glad somebody thought it was interesting. I have found the discussion interesting.
If you note from many of my posts, I'll frequently say it's "A" or "B". If I defend one or the other, it's to get i
This discussion is really fascinating. I too was under the mistaken impression that PI
represented something that was taboo to include in my derived work, no matter where I
got it from. Sort of like the fictional agreement Lee suggested.
I see it's nothing like that. Essentially I'm required to
