Hi All
The project is moving forward very slowly. I my opinion one of the main
reasons behind it is lack of unified distribution build system.
Previous releases were put together manually. Probably one or two core
contributors would be be able to repeat the whole process at this point
withou
Great idea, worth the pain!
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Andrzej Szeszo wrote:
> Hi All
>
> The project is moving forward very slowly. I my opinion one of the main
> reasons behind it is lack of unified distribution build system.
>
> Previous releases were put together manually. Probably on
A laudable aim but do we have the man power to do it, without negatively
affecting our existing schedules for illumos and stable releases?
Bye,
Deano
From: Colin Ellis [mailto:panamaya...@gmail.com]
Sent: 16 March 2011 11:46
To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list
Subject: Re: [oi-dev] Dist
On 16 Mar 2011, at 12:12, Deano wrote:
> A laudable aim but do we have the man power to do it, without negatively
> affecting our existing schedules for illumos and stable releases?
Can we afford *not* to do it? Anything to make it easier and more practical for
contributions the better...
Chr
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:35:58 +
> From: Andrzej Szeszo
> To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list
> Subject: [oi-dev] Distribution build system
> Message-ID: <4d80a09e.2060...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Hi All
>
> The project is
On 03/16/11 13:34, Chris Ridd wrote:
On 16 Mar 2011, at 12:12, Deano wrote:
> A laudable aim but do we have the man power to do it, without negatively
affecting our existing schedules for illumos and stable releases?
Can we afford*not* to do it? Anything to make it easier and more practical
Hi Butch
Individual consolidations that form OpenIndiana distribution are using
different build systems. Some consolidations are available in binary
form only.
I propose creating a unified infrastructure on top of all build systems
so that full or incremental builds of the whole OS could be
On 16 Mar 2011, at 15:43, Andrzej Szeszo wrote:
> On 03/16/11 13:34, Chris Ridd wrote:
>> On 16 Mar 2011, at 12:12, Deano wrote:
>>
>>
>>> >
>>> A laudable aim but do we have the man power to do it, without negatively
>>> affecting our existing schedules for illumos and stable releases?
>>>
On 03/16/11 09:12 AM, Chris Ridd wrote:
> FWIW at work we have an XML file describing each release as (essentially) a
> number of git repos + tags to checkout, and then what script to run to build
> each given repo. Our overall build script goes through that XML in order, and
> is able to do "th
Thanks for the link Alan. We will definitely evaluate it.
Andrzej
On Wednesday, 16 March 2011, Alan Coopersmith
wrote:
> On 03/16/11 09:12 AM, Chris Ridd wrote:
>> FWIW at work we have an XML file describing each release as (essentially) a
>> number of git repos + tags to checkout, and then wha
On 16 Mar 2011, at 16:34, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> On 03/16/11 09:12 AM, Chris Ridd wrote:
>> FWIW at work we have an XML file describing each release as (essentially) a
>> number of git repos + tags to checkout, and then what script to run to build
>> each given repo. Our overall build script
11 matches
Mail list logo
