On 4 Oct 2011, at 12:24, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
> * Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [2011-10-02 02:59]:
>> Any issues with merging this?
>>
>> http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-bdb/rev/ecc62b981eb7
>>
>> (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1262)
>>
>> Thanks,
>
> The Userland-gate mirror is back online, so y
Hi Bayard,
On 4 Oct 2011, at 02:09, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
> If OI decides now is the time to start delivering, let's at least check
> for other areas of overlap and make sure that we're standing solidly on
> your shoulders. In particular, how about other questions raised, such as
> delivering deb
Hi Guido,
On 3 Oct 2011, at 23:55, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
> Also the documentation should be delivered into
> /usr/share/doc/ and not /usr/docs.
Good catch!
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-d
Hi Jeff, Bayard,
Bayard - nice review points!
On 3 Oct 2011, at 18:06, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
> 2) is there any basis for thinking that bdb should only be built for
> 32-bit support, or would we reasonably expect that 64-bit binaries would
> need to link against it?
For a library like bdb, we sh
On 3 Oct 2011, at 23:31, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 17:08 -0400, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:34 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
>>> Bayard made a good point, one will generally want multiple versions of
>>> bdb.
>>> Thoughts about having bdb-4.8 (and bd
Hi Jeff,
On 3 Oct 2011, at 21:12, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 06:06:47PM +0100, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
>> A few items, as much questions as anything else:
>>
>> 1) given that you usually end up needing multiple bdbs, should the
>> standard here be to embed version componen
Hi Alex,
On 3 Oct 2011, at 22:08, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:34 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> Is there some special reason why you are working on this package, given
> that oi-sfe already delivers it and the "Before adding new packages to
> oi-build" remark in
> htt
On 2 Oct 2011, at 01:29, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> Any issues with merging this?
>
> http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-copyright/rev/d63a82a5f93f
>
> (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1567)
+1 as is - random developer is clear enough and crazy enough to get spotted if
someone forgets to change
On 3 Oct 2011, at 21:14, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 09:56:26PM +0200, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> * Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [2011-10-02 02:29]:
>>> Any issues with merging this?
>>>
>>> http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-gnupg/rev/6e09047a6043
>>>
>>> (https://www.i
Hi Bayard,
On 3 Oct 2011, at 18:11, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 20:29 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
>> Any issues with merging this?
>>
>> http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-gnupg/rev/6e09047a6043
>>
>> (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1220)
>
> If the bug report is agreed, I
On 20 Sep 2011, at 17:46, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:08:36AM +0100, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> On 19/09/2011 18:36, Peter Tribble wrote:
>>> My notes say that gmake-3.82 broke my build of gstreamer. I found that
>>> out pretty quickly and rolled back, s
On 3 Oct 2011, at 21:04, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
> * Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [2011-10-02 02:29]:
>> Any issues with merging this?
>>
>> http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-fetchmail/rev/63536c7f3b6f
>>
>> (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1590)
>>
>> Thanks,
>
> Might be worth mentioning somewhere (in
On 3 Oct 2011, at 21:01, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 06:35:36PM +0100, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
>> On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 20:29 -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
>>> Any issues with merging this?
>>>
>>> http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-xcowsay/rev/e11ec815dd5b
>>>
>>> (https:
Hi Josef,
On 2 Oct 2011, at 01:29, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> Any issues with merging this?
>
> http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-irssi/rev/32d69da311d7
>
> (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1576)
Great work on this - Guido obviously caught most of the bloopers (good finds
Guido!).
Thought I'd
On 3 Oct 2011, at 23:48, Bayard G. Bell wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 20:53 +0200, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
>
>> In general, if you move packages from another consolidation into
>> oi-build please at least check the original package.
>
> Right problem defined at the wrong level: we don't want p
The other historical problem with BDB is that they have on numerous
occasions changed the on-disk format, so just relinking an application
with a newer lib can easily break applications. That's far worse than
the API instability.
Gordon
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Richard Lowe wrote:
> This
Hi all,
If anyone is around we could have a quick oi-dev meeting at the usual time.
Cheers,
Alasdair
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
* Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [2011-10-02 02:59]:
> Any issues with merging this?
>
> http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-bdb/rev/ecc62b981eb7
>
> (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1262)
>
> Thanks,
The Userland-gate mirror is back online, so you should have a
look at
http://hg.openindiana.org/upstream/orac
On 4 October 2011 09:59, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
> Looks good. Illumos needs to fix
> https://www.illumos.org/license/CDDL
Yes, we do. See: https://www.illumos.org/issues/1170
I'll try and chase this up.
Cheers.
--
Joshua M. Clulow
UNIX Admin/Developer
http://blog.sysmgr.org
_
19 matches
Mail list logo
