Hello Alasdair,
Thank you for quick response.
As reported https://www.illumos.org/issues/378,
I got same problem in building open-fabrics, and I resolve it by
replacing /usr/include/sys/ib/adaptors/* header files provided by
Oracle Solaris 11.
Current tavor and hermon header files shipped with OI
Hi,
I'm getting the following error trying to build gcc44:
[...]
/home/yuri/oi-build/components/gcc44/build/i86/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/yuri/oi-build/components/gcc44/build/i86/./gcc/
-B/usr/gcc/4.4/i386-pc-solaris2.11/bin/
-B/usr/gcc/4.4/i386-pc-solaris2.11/lib/ -isystem
/usr/gcc/4.4/i386-pc-solaris2
Hi,
I have GCC4 (Rich Lowe version) on SPARC - have been built by GCC3
-Igor
On 11/28/11 9:26 PM, "Yuri Pankov" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm getting the following error trying to build gcc44:
>
>[...]
>/home/yuri/oi-build/components/gcc44/build/i86/./gcc/xgcc
>-B/home/yuri/oi-build/components/gcc44/buil
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 09:38:42PM +0400, Igor Kozhukhov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have GCC4 (Rich Lowe version) on SPARC - have been built by GCC3
That's nice to know, but doesn't give me any hints on solving the actual
problem. :-)
Yuri
> On 11/28/11 9:26 PM, "Yuri Pankov" wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >
Looks like you need this patch from Rich:
https://github.com/richlowe/gcc/commit/610511a2a04185795a2e0d08ff25369126719346
Sent from my iPad
On Nov 28, 2011, at 10:05 PM, Yuri Pankov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 09:38:42PM +0400, Igor Kozhukhov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have GCC4 (Rich Lowe ve
You need Rainer's patch to disable the use of CFI. See my il-4_4_4
branch, or pull it out of svn.
-- Rich
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 02:18:17PM -0500, Richard Lowe wrote:
> You need Rainer's patch to disable the use of CFI. See my il-4_4_4
> branch, or pull it out of svn.
Thanks, Alexander and Richard. That solved it. Now I'm wondering why the
patch isn't in oi-build - not needed?
Yuri
__
> Thanks, Alexander and Richard. That solved it. Now I'm wondering why the
> patch isn't in oi-build - not needed?
Certainly should be necessary. If it's not, someone did something
worse (forced gld, or whatever)
-- Rich
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev
I have plan - prepare patch from your version go GCC44 and add it to
illumos-userland.
-Igor
On 11/28/11 11:52 PM, "Richard Lowe" wrote:
>> Thanks, Alexander and Richard. That solved it. Now I'm wondering why the
>> patch isn't in oi-build - not needed?
>
>Certainly should be necessary. If it'
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 14:54, Igor Kozhukhov wrote:
> I have plan - prepare patch from your version go GCC44 and add it to
> illumos-userland.
>
The whole reason OI haven't done that is that I asked them not to
until I'd got the set of changes settled.
-- Rich
_
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 23:54 +0400, Igor Kozhukhov wrote:
> I have plan - prepare patch from your version go GCC44 and add it to
> illumos-userland.
We need to do more than that: oi-build and illumos-userland need to
converge into a single upstream. It's not a novel suggestion, so, as you
might exp
Illumos-userland is ready for working!
We can start to push changes to it with review process from OI-BUILD.
Have to identify persons who can push to repo and how we will test
packages before commits.
-Igor
On 11/29/11 12:25 AM, "Bayard G. Bell" wrote:
>On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 23:54 +0400, Igor
12 matches
Mail list logo
