Good points. So, a major question: Is /dev good enough for /release promotion?
Any known or reported issues to resolve beforehand?
~ Ken Mays
___
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
On 2013-07-12 15:47, ken mays wrote:
Good points. So, a major question: Is /dev good enough for /release
promotion?
Any known or reported issues to resolve beforehand?
I'd say - the kernel should be updated to have the most current
features regarding ZFS/NFS and other goodies recently
On 12/07/2013 15:47, ken mays wrote:
Good points. So, a major question: Is /dev good enough for /release promotion?
Any known or reported issues to resolve beforehand?
All illumos NFS fixes, at least, probably the last stable can
be put in safely (have a short /dev/a8 prelease if in doubt).
On 11 July 2013 01:12, Adam Števko adam.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
1.1- should not be bureaucratic, i.e. rather an internal agreement
(Alex)
I support this type for now.
I believe this is commonly agreed now - we go on without complicated
process, hack-on-go basis, sending reviews into the
On 12 July 2013 13:49, G B g_patri...@yahoo.com wrote:
/hipster should be the -current like FreeBSD
/dev should be -stable like FreeBSD
/release or /stable should be -RELEASE like FreeBSD
/hipster can keep having its breakage, that is fine. But what I'd see is
/dev get illumos-gate updates
On 2013-07-12 17:37, Erol Zavidic wrote:
contributor there?I would enable Issues in Repo and start filling in
first tasks. Easy coordination and task assignment + reduction of
duplicate work.
Just before you all dive into this, I just wanted a short
sanity check: what are the particular
On 07/12/2013 19:52, Jim Klimov wrote:
On 2013-07-12 17:42, Erol Zavidic wrote:
Important question over here:
Are we ever going to promote hipster to /dev or /release then? This is
question in particular due to gcc/sunstudio differences.
Why not? Code is code. /hipster can be compiled with
Hello.
I'm trying to import SUNWxscreensaver.spec to oi-userland.
The issue is that it is actually three different packages. I've almost
finished with xscreensaver itself, but there are also
xscreensaver/hacks, xscreensaver/hacks/hacks-gl and
xscreensaver/hacks/rss-glx.
The process of
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 08:23:45PM +0400, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
Hello.
I'm trying to import SUNWxscreensaver.spec to oi-userland.
The issue is that it is actually three different packages. I've
almost finished with xscreensaver itself, but there are also
xscreensaver/hacks,
On 2013-07-12 18:09, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
Hello.
It's almost unreal.
Well, it was worth trying to offer the idea, good or bad :)
We now struggle with two different compilers in
base, and the only logic way in my opinion is to just go on with GCC.
Code can't be just recompiled, every
Hi,
is there any process in place for moving bits from JDS to userland? I
was thinking about possibility to update some JDS bits (with specs, of
course). And I need to know which bits I could remove from JDS. Could
anybody responsible for hipster release engineering talk to me about it?
As for
Hello, Milan and others.
On 07/12/2013 22:05, Milan Jurik wrote:
Hi,
is there any process in place for moving bits from JDS to userland? I
was thinking about possibility to update some JDS bits (with specs, of
course). And I need to know which bits I could remove from JDS. Could
anybody
/dev is solid, but /hipster is ripe with breaking. The only way to do that is
to move /dev to /release and when /hipster is mostly stable, then move it to
/dev to work out the rest of the problems before moving to /release.
This would have to be done on a mostly conservative schedule like
Good evening everybody,
I managed to bump libxml2 to version 2.9.1. Please have a look at the
changeset and review it please. Library built, tested, published and
installed correctly.
https://github.com/erolms/oi-userland/compare/libxml2
If all OK I can send pull request then for zlib and
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Erol Zavidic ero...@gmail.com wrote:
Good evening everybody,
I managed to bump libxml2 to version 2.9.1. Please have a look at the
changeset and review it please. Library built, tested, published and
installed correctly.
if it is version from oracle userland-gate - works well for me with DilOS a
long time.
--
Best regards,
Igor Kozhukhov
On Jul 13, 2013, at 2:06 AM, Peter Tribble wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Erol Zavidic ero...@gmail.com wrote:
Good evening everybody,
I managed to bump
Erol,
I went over the spec. Looks very good.
Captures the upstream patches.
~ Ken
From: Erol Zavidic ero...@gmail.com
To: oi-dev oi-dev@openindiana.org
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 4:48 PM
Subject: [oi-dev] Bumping libxml2 to v2.9.1
Good evening
Erol,
I went over the spec. Looks very good.
Captures the upstream patches.
~ Ken
From: Erol Zavidic ero...@gmail.com
To: oi-dev oi-dev@openindiana.org
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 4:48 PM
Subject: [oi-dev] Bumping libxml2 to v2.9.1
Good evening
Erol,
I went over the spec. Looks very good.
Captures the upstream patches.
~ Ken
From: Erol Zavidic ero...@gmail.com
To: oi-dev oi-dev@openindiana.org
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 4:48 PM
Subject: [oi-dev] Bumping libxml2 to v2.9.1
Good evening
19 matches
Mail list logo
