On 10/ 9/13 08:45 PM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
On 10/09/2013 20:28, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
I was looking at different php packages.
It seems that currently php-idn upstream is dead.
There are several patches (for example, used in Fedora) which allow it
to be built with php 5.4.
However, some
Hello.
I've just obsoleted PHP 5.2 packages in OI /hipster.
The reason was lack of upstream support (latest release in January of
2011) and absence of maintainer. Also it would be broken after planned
net-snmp update.
So, all php-52* packages were obsoleted and will be removed on update.
Als
On 10/11/2013 13:27, Jonathan Adams wrote:
If I non-sticky it, and change it to "search-after" the hipster I get the
"system/library" in the update list ... should I risk unfreezing the zlib,
do you think? will it work if I don't unfreeze it?
I don't know. Boot environments allows you to safe
On 11/10/13 09:39, Nikola M. wrote:
Does this means that Sun Studio / Oracle studio will not be able to run
on Openindiana after this change?
So it is intentional breaking compatibiliy with Studio or including all
software compiled with Studio?
Are you willing to have distribution that does not
Laurent Blume wrote:
> Studio itself has now introduced a G++ ABI compatibility switch. So
> having G++-built libs in /usr/lib should not be the issue it once was.
> http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E24457_01/html/E21991/bkana.html#bkanr
The problem is that this doea not help you with existing binarie
On 11/10/13 11:47, Joerg Schilling wrote:
The problem is that this doea not help you with existing binaries and it would
be better if gcc would implement the stable studio interfaces instead it's own
variable interfaces.
Well, a switch is a switch. I've had to think about the issue in
OpenCSW,
Laurent Blume wrote:
> Finally, since Oracle seems to be planning to add the G++ ABI into
> Studio 12.4 sparc, it appears to be on the verge of becoming the
> de-facto standard.
> Reality check: having a vastly multiplatform standard is *good*, even if
> it was Not Invented Here. And the more
On 11/10/13 14:02, Joerg Schilling wrote:
I am not trying to discuss where it came from but whether it will be stable in
the future.
The last incompatible change was *11 years ago*, and it was a bug fix,
it was not just because they like to break things.
http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html#timel
sendmail working happily with old zlib. Additionally now have a working
local package server, which failed all the time beforehand.
Will try updating again with the newer zlib when I next feel like rebooting
:)
Thanks, Jon
On 11 October 2013 10:30, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> On 10/11/2013 13
On 10/11/13 06:15 AM, Laurent Blume wrote:
Too bad that Sun was not there - but as it happens, some actually good standards
were Not Invented By Sun and yet are useful.
There are mentions of Sun though on the ABI committee page, so it wasn't
completely out of the picture:
http://mentorembedded
On 11/10/2013 09:39, Nikola M. wrote:
Does this means that Sun Studio / Oracle studio will not be able to run
on Openindiana after this change?
So it is intentional breaking compatibiliy with Studio or including all
software compiled with Studio?
...
I would not like to loose ability to run
On 10/11/13 11:38 AM, Laurent Blume wrote:
On 11/10/13 09:39, Nikola M. wrote:
Does this means that Sun Studio / Oracle studio will not be able to run
on Openindiana after this change?
So it is intentional breaking compatibiliy with Studio or including all
software compiled with Studio?
Are you
12 matches
Mail list logo
