Re: [oi-dev] Tasks to focus on

2021-01-22 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
Your name sounds very familiar. Are you the guy under Portable Object Compiler? BTW, you could get texlive and possibly fontforge (not checked, though) via pkgsrc, either via Joyent's binary repo or build from source. Check pkgsrc.org. On Sat, 23 Jan 2021 13:47:30 +0700 s...@pandora.be

Re: [oi-dev] cross/mingw-w64 failed to compile on SunOS

2021-01-19 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
The SunOS variant I'm using is OpenIndiana. I think it's better to contact the developers of it rather than doing our own patches to mingw-w64. On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 17:08:49 +0700 Hung Nguyen Gia wrote > It has more than just SHARED. > > I edited deffilep.c and add #undef SH

[oi-dev] Fwd: cross/mingw-w64 failed to compile on SunOS

2021-01-19 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
mingw-w64 failed to build on OI. Forwarded message From: Hung Nguyen Gia To: "Pkgsrc Users" Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:17:22 +0700 Subject: cross/mingw-w64 failed to compile on SunOS Forwarded message > In file included from /usr/include/dlf

Re: [oi-dev] OpenIndiana Developer Edition

2021-01-18 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
device drivers and pack packages in a better way > for Oracle Solaris 11.3 in hope to apply this knowledge for OI. > But i had no way to install OI on my Microsoft Surface. > > ________________ > From: Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev [oi-dev@openindiana.o

Re: [oi-dev] OpenIndiana Developer Edition

2021-01-17 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
us as the upstream ended any > kind of support of Python 2.x and without proper experience you are just put > potential users in danger. > > Thanks for understanding, > Adam > > > > > On 16 Jan 2021, at 11:02, Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev > >

[oi-dev] OpenIndiana Developer Edition

2021-01-16 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
Someone on this list challenged me of forking OpenIndiana in order for my changes to be accepted. This is exactly what I'm going to do now. But I will do it moderately, according to my skills. I wanted to build something like in the title. It's the normal desktop OI plus the following packages:

Re: [oi-dev] Shipping the nano editor alongside with vi

2021-01-11 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
Sorry. I had a really bad day. I hope I could call back some of my mails. But it's impossible anyway. On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:15:08 +0700 Michael Schuster wrote > Hi Hung, > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 8:39 AM Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev > wrote: > Maybe.

Re: [oi-dev] Shipping the nano editor alongside with vi

2021-01-11 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
Toomas Soome via oi-dev > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 11. Jan 2021, at 09:39, Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev > > > wrote: > > > > > > Maybe... I'm impolite. But what if I'm just visit here once for this > > > purpose then? &g

Re: [oi-dev] Shipping the nano editor alongside with vi

2021-01-11 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
editing. Yes, vi is historically part of any Unix. But at least, on FreeBSD, they have a fallback, the ee editor, included by default. It's basically what I'm asking for. On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:00:28 +0700 Toomas Soome via oi-dev wrote > > > > On 11. Jan

Re: [oi-dev] Porting of the Epiphany Browser

2021-01-10 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
nly to be another PoS. Maybe their Pythonic syntax you are already familiar with you could deal easier than me. I give up on this sh8t altogether. On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 12:47:50 +0700 Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev wrote > I guest I figured out how to make libdazzle compiles, but I

Re: [oi-dev] Shipping the nano editor alongside with vi

2021-01-10 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
; [1] the origin of this proverb appears to be quite contested, but it > seems like it might be Lao-Tzu. > > Tim > > > On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 00:49:50 +0700 Aurélien Larcher > > wrote > > > > > > > > >

Re: [oi-dev] Porting of the Epiphany Browser

2021-01-09 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
is you have to deal with this to have libdazzle packaged in your repo. After that, I could continue with Epiphany itself. ---- On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 09:53:21 +0700 Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev wrote > More detail: > > Packages needed to install on OI: gcc-10 cmake ninja meson

Re: [oi-dev] Porting of the Epiphany Browser

2021-01-09 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
More detail: Packages needed to install on OI: gcc-10 cmake ninja meson git pkg-config vala Environment variable to set: export PKG_CONFIG_PATH='/usr/lib/64/pkgconfig' We're doing a 64 bit build. I don't know why, but gobject-introspection is not available on/usr/lib/pkgconfig, so we forced to

Re: [oi-dev] Shipping the nano editor alongside with vi

2021-01-09 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
Larcher wrote > > > On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 9:09 AM Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev > wrote: > This should be done for none desktop OI flavors: OI text and OI minimal. > > It will help novice user like me very much. Please consider it, developers. > I have trouble us

Re: [oi-dev] Porting of the Epiphany Browser

2021-01-09 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
I'm totally amateur. Please pardon me. On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 02:15:15 +0700 Alan Coopersmith wrote > On 1/9/21 11:03 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 8:00 PM Alan Coopersmith > > wrote: > >> I can say that libdazzle builds on Solaris, but we apply this patch

Re: [oi-dev] Porting of the Epiphany Browser

2021-01-09 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
wrote: > > > > On 1/9/21 12:15 AM, Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev wrote: > > > In no way I'm a professional developer. I just pulled the source of it > > > from github and tried to compile it by following the instructions. > > > > > > https

Re: [oi-dev] What's wrong with Pale Moon?

2021-01-09 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
If I can I already done. I know I'm just a little man I can't deal with monster like Firefox. My requirements are low. A browser could load non videos site fine is enough for me. So I decided to continue with Epiphany. BTW, it's the GNOME project's official browser. Being backed by GNOME, it's

Re: [oi-dev] Tasks to focus on

2021-01-09 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
Hi. Do you see this mail on the archive? I didn't see it. Resend it for you to not miss my vote. On Sat, 09 Jan 2021 23:18:41 +0700 Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev wrote > I hope you are happily to read me, too. You should remember me when we > encountered on illumos.org/

Re: [oi-dev] Tasks to focus on

2021-01-09 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
I hope you are happily to read me, too. You should remember me when we encountered on illumos.org/issues page. If you want to know, my vote is: Building with GCC-10 and Updating Clang. Compiler tool chain is one of the weakness of OI. If you could get the latest stable compiler working and able

Re: [oi-dev] Porting of the Epiphany Browser

2021-01-09 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
o the right direction, but we > won't run a second build setup on our side. > > BTW. also have a look into solaris-userland > https://github.com/oracle/solaris-userland and > https://github.com/joyent/pkgsrc-joyent if there is any patches needed > for the sources

Re: [oi-dev] What's wrong with Pale Moon?

2021-01-09 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
o get his binary build. I will continue using Pale Moon to be able to watch 4K videos on youtube on OI, regardless of it's accepted to be packaged by the OI team or not. On Sat, 09 Jan 2021 19:19:09 +0700 Volker A. Brandt wrote ---- > Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev writes: > >

[oi-dev] What's wrong with Pale Moon?

2021-01-09 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
Our Firefox is way too outdated. Pale Moon is the only browser working well on OI. I came across a page on their site but can't find it again, it basically stated that the packaging of Pale Moon on OI was resisted by OI developers. So what's wrong with Pale Moon? I know their branding issue. Bu

[oi-dev] Porting of the Epiphany Browser

2021-01-09 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
In no way I'm a professional developer. I just pulled the source of it from github and tried to compile it by following the instructions. https://github.com/GNOME/epiphany Currently, I'm stuck at libdazzle. I will not compile under OI. https://github.com/GNOME/libdazzle Any helps would be appr

[oi-dev] Shipping the nano editor alongside with vi

2021-01-09 Thread Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev
This should be done for none desktop OI flavors: OI text and OI minimal. It will help novice user like me very much. Please consider it, developers. I have trouble using the vi editor even though I have my mobile phone with me as a backup showing the vi tutorial. And I think many other novice us