Re: [oi-dev] GCC rebuilds

On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 06:25:46PM +0100, Peter Tribble wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 05:09:26PM +0200, Marcel Telka wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 02:38:32PM +0100, Peter Tribble wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 6:41 AM Stephan Althaus < > > > > stephan.alth...@duedinghausen.eu>

Re: [oi-dev] GCC rebuilds

On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 05:09:26PM +0200, Marcel Telka wrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 02:38:32PM +0100, Peter Tribble wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 6:41 AM Stephan Althaus < > > stephan.alth...@duedinghausen.eu> wrote: > > > We are stumbling over some faults with regard to the GCC Version

Re: [oi-dev] libssp misplaced in g++-X-runtime

Hi, what if as a temorary fix, the g++-X-runtime is getting a new dependency on corresponding gcc-X-runtime? Then every older user package requiring g++-X-runtime would get libssp in package gcc-X-runtime through that dependency. Over the time, old user packages all move to gcc-X-runtime

Re: [oi-dev] How to kill old sfe package meta-data?

Gordon, what is the final goal you try to achieve? Do you want updating to a more fresh sfe repository, or want removing just for upgrade and re-adding or remove sfe completely? I would try enabling the sfe publisher and update the packages from that publisher. Then re-try the uninstall But I'm

Re: [oi-dev] How to kill old sfe package meta-data?

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:18:35PM -0400, Gordon Ross wrote: > tried pkg update too: > # pkg -R /mnt update library/mpc > No updates available for this image. > > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 5:43 PM Till Wegmüller wrote: [..] > > > sfe(disabled) origin online F > > >

Re: [oi-dev] Wiki comments

Hi, even if I don't like the content written in a few selected comments, I would not just disable all without a closer look. If we find a way to preserve the message of the more valuable comments, that would be cool. In that case someone would need to edit the articles and merge in the

Re: [oi-dev] Apache OpenOffice retirement - all contributors fled to LibreOffice after Oracle Sun takeover Fwd: Broken components

On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 10:31:41PM +0200, Aur??lien Larcher wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Lionel Cons wrote: > > Sigh. What should I say? Was this not the expected outcome? I could > > argue Oracle has to learn about managing communities, but I'd say no > >

Re: [oi-dev] Wine 1.9.10 : compilation trial

unction) > > #define ES_sig(context) ((context)->uc_mcontext.gregs[ES]) > > ^ > > signal_i386.c:1840:5: note: in expansion of macro 'ES_sig' > > ES_sig(sigcontext) = wine_get_es(); > > ^ > > signa

Re: [oi-dev] gcc 5.3 testing

Sorry, malformed copy/paste. It killed the sequence "A and made an out of it. +#undef LINK_LIBGCC_SPEC +#define LINK_LIBGCC_SPEC "%{m64:" "-R /usr/gcc/4.8/lib/"ARCH64_SUBDIR":/usr/gcc/lib/"ARCH64_SUBDIR" %D" "}%{!m64:" "-R /usr/gcc/4.8/lib:/usr/gcc/lib %D" "}"

Re: [oi-dev] gcc 5.3 testing

IR ":%R/lib/" > ARCH64_SUBDIR ":%R/usr/lib/" ARCH64_SUBDIR " -R %R/usr/gcc/5.3/lib/" > ARCH64_SUBDIR " -L %R/usr/gcc/5.3/lib/" ARCH64_SUBDIR "} \ > +%{!p:%{!pg:-Y P,%R/usr/gcc/5.3/lib/" A

Re: [oi-dev] libjpeg-turbo and VLC

k external consumers (e.g., SFE). > --- > System Administrator of Southern Federal University Computer Center > >-- >--- > Praise the Caffeine embeddings > > References > >1. mailto:a...@rsu.ru > _

Re: [oi-dev] Stats

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 08:41:47PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Sat, 13 Dec 2014, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: OI Hipster change log can be found here: http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/oi_hipster I think that this looks impressive. The main issue (feature-wise) seems to be the loss of

Re: [oi-dev] [HEADSUP] Sun Studio-compiled C++ libraries are no longer supported

On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 07:17:06PM +0100, Udo Grabowski (IMK) wrote: [...] This also obsoletes all packages of the SFE project. Any replacements planned ? No, it seems I.m wrong, SFE packages depend on oi 151 /dev packages and probably cannot be installed on /hipster generally. It is a

Re: [oi-dev] sigcpp issue

___ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev -- -- Thomas Wagner Service rund um UNIX(TM), Wagner Network Services

Re: [oi-dev] sigcpp issue

Hi Alexander, [...] As always, I'm the one to blame for it. However, this particular conflict could be caused by directory permission. True, permissions differ. the pkg contents dump of pkg:/sfe/library/g++/sigcpp prints what we default to. It should be in sync with what is in /usr.

Re: [oi-dev] current process for architectural decisions OI

Hi Alexander On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 09:44:36AM +0400, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: Hello, Thomas. Thomas Wagner писал 14.08.2013 22:28: What is currenty the process / method / agreement for architectural decisions in OI? Is there any? If not, I take it that a single person who

Re: [oi-dev] introducing gfortran or make gcc refactoring?

Okay, any updates on the runtime lib questions? I believe OI should not implement that massive change without a proper architectional discussion. Just taking what a different Distro does, is not an architectural discussion in my view. (This Disto in mind is a somewhat privately baked, unique

Re: [oi-dev] introducing gfortran or make gcc refactoring?

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:47:37PM +0400, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: Hello. On 07/29/2013 11:54, Andrzej Szeszo wrote: Hi Alexander [...] I see your point. I've looked at something like this: https://github.com/pyhalov/oi-userland/compare/gcc-links to avoid duplicating