BTW, OI may want to look into providing the Microsoft Web Fonts somehow, but
you'd have to be careful putting them into your main pkg repo directly as the
license terms do not allow redistributing for profit. I remember some Linux
distros coming up with a variety of solutions for packaging them w
On 19 December 2010 16:42, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> BTW, OI may want to look into providing the Microsoft Web Fonts somehow, but
> you'd have to be careful putting them into your main pkg repo directly as the
> license terms do not allow redistributing for profit. I remember some Linux
> distro
On 12/19/10 10:44 AM, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> On 19 December 2010 16:42, Alan Coopersmith
> wrote:
>> BTW, OI may want to look into providing the Microsoft Web Fonts somehow, but
>> you'd have to be careful putting them into your main pkg repo directly as the
>> license terms do not allow redi
On 19 December 2010 18:57, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> Hiya,
>> You don't need the microsoft fonts, there's the liberty fonts
>> https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts/
>
> You already have those in OpenIndiana, but that's just a couple fonts
> (basically replacements for Times, Helvetica, Couri
On 12/20/10 07:57 AM, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
>
> What is the reason for bitmapped fonts not being disabled as in
> upstream fontconfig and the big Linux distros?
I didn't realize we were different than upstream. I believe the
reason it's there is because the CJK (Chinese/Japanese/Korean)
font
* Alan Coopersmith [2010-12-20 18:01]:
> I didn't realize we were different than upstream. I believe the
> reason it's there is because the CJK (Chinese/Japanese/Korean)
> fonts often look much better in bitmaps than scaled, due to the
> difficulty of well hinting 20,000+ glyphs, but would have
