so they're not really equal.
From: Bayard Bell buffer.g.overf...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:10:39 +
To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org
Subject: Re: [oi-dev] Lets talk about Git
I
When the subject came up on IRC last week, I went ahead and registered the
organization OpenIndiana on Github. Whether it goes under that organization,
or as a team under the Illumos organization, makes no difference to me.
-M
On Feb 12, 2012, at 9:49 AM, Andrew Stormont wrote:
Hi all,
At
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Stormont píše v ne 12. 02. 2012 v 14:49 +:
Hi all,
At the Illumos meetup in Brussels it was proposed that we migrate
illumos-userland to GitHub. There were several good reasons for
making the switch but the two main ones were: git is faster (because
most of it is
Andy,
I'd think we could use the same tools that illumos uses to mirror from
their authoritative repo to BitBucket and GitHub. I'd expect there are two
non-exclusive ways to approach mirroring: you can add hooks to the
canonical repo that cause it to push to the DVCS hubs as part of the
commit,
2012/2/12 Andrew Stormont andyjstorm...@gmail.com
On 12/02/2012 16:06, Milan Jurik milan.ju...@xylab.cz wrote:
And about familiarity - shouldn't it be more about usability/simplicity?
Hi,
Hopefully this will answer your questions http://whygitisbetterthanx.com/#
Avert your eyes,
From: Bayard Bell buffer.g.overf...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:20:33 +
To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org
Subject: Re: [oi-dev] Lets talk about Git
2012/2/12 Andrew Stormont andyjstorm
Hi,
Andrew Stormont píše v ne 12. 02. 2012 v 17:13 +:
On 12/02/2012 16:06, Milan Jurik milan.ju...@xylab.cz wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Stormont píše v ne 12. 02. 2012 v 14:49 +:
Hi all,
At the Illumos meetup in Brussels it was proposed that we migrate
illumos-userland
On 02/12/12 09:29 AM, Milan Jurik wrote:
Btw. how is status of cadmium features on git? Like recommit?
git rebase is far more powerful useful than cadmium recommit,
especially once you learn git rebase --interactive.
The cadmium features that are missing from git are the ones more
specific
Hi Alan,
Alan Coopersmith píše v ne 12. 02. 2012 v 10:01 -0800:
On 02/12/12 09:29 AM, Milan Jurik wrote:
Btw. how is status of cadmium features on git? Like recommit?
git rebase is far more powerful useful than cadmium recommit,
especially once you learn git rebase --interactive.
I
richlowe's been working on both, but neither are in use with OI.
My preference for all of this functionality would be to have the validation
done by the pull request. Webrevs could be generated automatically, and the
applicable nits would give feedback requesting either that they be resolved
for
@openindiana.org
Subject: Re: [oi-dev] Lets talk about Git
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Andrew Stormont andyjstorm...@gmail.com
wrote:
I just want to say straightaway that I apologise. My intention is not to
start a flamewar or bike shedding but to merely show that there are benefits
to offering git
From: Bayard Bell buffer.g.overf...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:40:32 +
To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org
Subject: Re: [oi-dev] Lets talk about Git
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 5:25 PM
.
Andrew
From: Bayard Bell buffer.g.overf...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:40:32 +
To: OpenIndiana Developer mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org
Subject: Re: [oi-dev] Lets talk about Git
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 5:25
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 15:49, Andrew Stormont andyjstorm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
At the Illumos meetup in Brussels it was proposed that we migrate
illumos-userland to GitHub. There were several good reasons for making the
switch but the two main ones were: git is faster (because most of
Thanks for the write-up and diagram, Jeppe.
I don't think the idea is that trusted means that a commit goes right to
the repo: I think trusted means if it clears CI, it's good to go. Everyone
else has to have eyeballs and peer review. Maybe core people can do manual
pushes straight to the repo,
15 matches
Mail list logo
