It's just a header. Go ahead and copy it, even change the names from OIIO to
OCIO if you want.
On Dec 9, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Jeremy Selan wrote:
No verdict yet...
I'm really hesitant to include load this header 'live' from an OIIO install.
The rationale is that I'd prefer to make the OCIO uni
No verdict yet...
I'm really hesitant to include load this header 'live' from an OIIO
install. The rationale is that I'd prefer to make the OCIO unittests part
of the core installation, and by loading this from OIIO we'd introduce a
circular dependency with OIIO.
Perhaps we could argue that unit
Ok I take back my statement about that being the only issue...
These 3 lines:
inline double log2(double x) {
return log(x) * 1.4426950408889634;
}
***DO*** need to be included for FreeBSD.
Once I had THAT included and the removal of inclusion of
for FreeBSD, it works fine.
Sorry didn't ha
Brecht, Larry (whoever else...)
There is also another issue...
src/ptex.imageio/ptex/PtexPlatform.h
FreeBSD does not have alloca.h as part of it's sources, so that needs
to be a conditional as well.
It's pretty simple as the one function OIIO needs from it is defined
in stdlib.h on FreeBSD alrea
What was the verdict on this, Jeremy?
Do you want us to export unittest.h?
On Dec 6, 2011, at 12:24 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Chris Foster wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>> I'm working on packaging OCIO for Fedora and I'm runnin