Hi,
I have some queries that used to work fine with OJB 1.0.RC6 and that fail
with OJB 1.0.RC7 and 1.0.0 (see sample below).
With RC6 I could use an alias to access an attribute to be added to the list
of attributes to be retrieved by my report query (method setAttributes) and
the generated SQ
Hello,
When using PersistentFieldIntrospectorImplNew I get the following error:
Caused by: org.apache.ojb.broker.metadata.MetadataException: Can't find
member 'myProperty' in somePackage.MyClass
at
org.apache.ojb.broker.metadata.fieldaccess.AbstractPersistentField.computeField(Unknown
S
I'll take a stab at it.
when performing OQL queries using OJB, you get back the complete object
A with references to B, C and further objects if they exist otherwise
they are null.
Assuming you have the following objects..
A{
B b;
int bId;
C c;
int cId;
}
and
C{
D d;
int dId;
}
D{
id;
nam
>
> When I obtain a date throw OJB its format changes from the original
> configured in the DB. I mean my postgres DB is set to show dates
> in a "dd/mm/" format an OJB shows a "-mm-dd" format.
> Is there anyway to configure OJB to work with a particular date format
> or do I have to do th
Hi,
I'm getting wrong results when executing a Query with Criteria that uses
path expression for extent with Multiple Joined Tables:
The QueryByCriteria from class myproject.User where [myCompany.shortcut
= COMPANYX, [login = UserX]]
The expected result is that returns only the User of COMPANY
Hi!
Well, here I am with the ODMG 3.0 book trying to perform OQL querys
through OJB but I really think I just dont get it.
Lets suppose I have a table A with FK to B and C where C has a FK to D
Something like this:
B
/
A
\
C
\
D
Which are mapped to the objects A, B, C and D.
Now I w
hi martin,
ojb does not use the dateformat defined in the database.
jakob
Martin I. Levi wrote:
Hi!
When I obtain a date throw OJB its format changes from the original
configured in the DB. I mean my postgres DB is set to show dates
in a "dd/mm/" format an OJB shows a "-mm-dd" format.
Is th
hi jamo,
the comparison is done in sql not in java.
jakob
Jamo Smith wrote:
Hey Folks!
I ran into a problem tonight trying to return a list of entries that match a
specific date.
For testing purposes I am passing a date object into addEqualTo that I built
like this:
Date date = new Date();
date.
Hi!
When I obtain a date throw OJB its format changes from the original
configured in the DB. I mean my postgres DB is set to show dates
in a "dd/mm/" format an OJB shows a "-mm-dd" format.
Is there anyway to configure OJB to work with a particular date format
or do I have to do this throu
Hi,
in the release notes it says :
"Batch handling doesn't work proper with optimistic locking. This will be
fixed
before long after 1.0"
What exactly does this mean?
Does it mean that when i have a persistence broker transaction, and within
that transaction i do save several objects, and one of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you Thomas,
I didn't remember seeing that in the release notes, but I should have figured it out. Not too familiar with Forrest yet. Upon recompiling, however, I was getting this new error below. I am too sleepy to figure it out tonight, but likely something just t
Congratulations guys (and girls???) !!!
-Original Message-
From: Mahler Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 4:08 PM
To: OJB Developers List; OJB Users List (E-Mail)
Subject: [ann] new release: OJB 1.0
Dear all,
I'm very happy to announce the final 1.0 releas
Thank you Thomas,
I didn't remember seeing that in the release notes, but I should have figured it out.
Not too familiar with Forrest yet. Upon recompiling, however, I was getting this new
error below. I am too sleepy to figure it out tonight, but likely something just
trivial I am missing.
13 matches
Mail list logo
