Re: Non-Decomposed m:n Mappings

2005-01-28 Thread Armin Waibel
Hi, this is really strange! The m:n part was refatored after 1.0.1, so if possible try latest from CVS (OJB_1_0_RELEASE branch, the upcoming OJB1.0.2 version, trunk is OJB1.1). This should work, because many test cases with m:n relation pass. If you think there is a bug in m:n handling (when

Re: connecting to LDAP

2005-01-28 Thread Armin Waibel
Hi Charles, Charles N. Harvey III wrote: Ok. New problem. I am connecting properly and all I had to do was set the useAutoCommit to 2. Guess I could have read the docs a bit better before. (I created a PlatformLDAPImpl but haven't even needed to use it.) useAutoCommit is global option, so if

Decomposed m:n mapping with ojb and jdo

2005-01-28 Thread Christoph Hermann
Hello, i try to realize an m:n mapping using ojb/jdo and update the java classes with cocoon using cforms. My problem ist, that i don't get the intermediate table to update correctly in the database. I have the following three classes: public class Profile implements Serializable {

storing unidirectional 1:n

2005-01-28 Thread ukasz Korzybski
Hello, I've got problem with storing unidirectional 1:n mapped objects (ojb 1.0.1, PostgreSQL 7.4), There are Person and Address classes. The Person class has got collection reference of Address classes but the Address doesn't have back-reference to the Person. from Person class: /**