Re: broken pipe?

I asked my provider and they didn't change anything. They pointed out the possible absence of autoReconnect=true in my JDBC url. Does anybody knows if that might help. I'd rather have that than a ping query for every call. Thanks, Dennis 2006/1/4, Dennis Bekkering [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thomas,

Re: broken pipe?

On 1/5/06, Dennis Bekkering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I asked my provider and they didn't change anything. They pointed out the possible absence of autoReconnect=true in my JDBC url. Does anybody knows if that might help. I'd rather have that than a ping query for every call. Hmm,

Re: bad sql on n-m relation to subclassed object

Sorry for multi posting, Otherwise, the version we use is 1.03 Jakob Braeuchi wrote: hi nicolas, i recommend not to cross-post, and to post the same message only once ;) further i recommend to tell us the version of ojb you're using. thank jakob -- Nicolas DELAHAYE

Re: bad sql on n-m relation to subclassed object

hi nicolas, i recommend not to cross-post, and to post the same message only once ;) further i recommend to tell us the version of ojb you're using. thank jakob [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi, It seems when i use a n-m relation to a subclassed object, the sql produced by ojb is not good.

Re: bad sql on n-m relation to subclassed object

hi nicolas, ojb just release 1.0.4. could you please try this as well ? jakob DELAHAYE Nicolas schrieb: Sorry for multi posting, Otherwise, the version we use is 1.03 Jakob Braeuchi wrote: hi nicolas, i recommend not to cross-post, and to post the same message only once ;) further i

Re: broken pipe?

i added testOnBorrow=true validationQuery=SELECT 1 to the descriptor, I'l wait and see what happens. Dennis 2006/1/5, Thomas Dudziak [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 1/5/06, Dennis Bekkering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I asked my provider and they didn't change anything. They