RE: BUGREPORT : OJB 1.0.5rc1 : UserAliases in OrderBy clauses are not replaced by the generated aliases for the joins resulting in illegal SQL statements

2008-02-04 Thread Janssen, Roger
Hi, The management summary answer to your question "is it important to support alias-names in order by and having clause" is : Yes, it is really really really important!!! So now for some background information explaining our situation. We implemented a concept to support non-modelled (abstract)

Optimizing object materialization for 1:N relations

2008-02-04 Thread Tino Schöllhorn
Hi, we are using OJB-1.0.1 and evertything works fine. Now I have the following situation: We have a security-mechanism which uses the classes ACL (AccessControlList) and ACLEntry. One ACL has many ACLEntries. Now when using the standard OJB-Materialization methods OJB uses 2 SQLs to mater