Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Two 1:N mappings to one table

2004-01-15 Thread Armin Waibel
t: Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2004 18:06 An: OJB Users List Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Two 1:N mappings to one table Hi Dirk, if you use Identity columns from database you can't use the default SequenceManager (SequenceManagerHighLowImpl). Have a look in http://db.apache.org/ojb/sequenceman

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Two 1:N mappings to one table

2004-01-15 Thread Dirk Manske (Service Respond)
thank you both. you helped me a lot in understanding ojb. I'll give it a try. Dirk -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Armin Waibel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2004 18:06 An: OJB Users List Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Two 1:N mappings to one table Hi

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Two 1:N mappings to one table

2004-01-15 Thread Armin Waibel
Hi Dirk, if you use Identity columns from database you can't use the default SequenceManager (SequenceManagerHighLowImpl). Have a look in http://db.apache.org/ojb/sequencemanager.html#nativeSequenceManager > can all do for me. In the repository-user.xml I set every pk column with > primarykey="t

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Two 1:N mappings to one table

2004-01-15 Thread Brian McCallister
No! You misunderstood me. Declare the PK's, FK's etc in the database. Do not abandon good database practices for OJB -- particularly as never know what programs will access the DB directly in the future. The DB managed auto-increment is the thing that is causing OJB to hiccup on you, I susp

AW: AW: AW: AW: Two 1:N mappings to one table

2004-01-15 Thread Dirk Manske (Service Respond)
hm. our db2 database tables are configured with an autoincrement for the primary keys by default. (for exampl: activityId INTEGER NOT NULL GENERATED BY DEFAULT AS IDENTITY (STARTS WITH 1, INCREMENT BY 1, NO CACHE, PRIMARY KEY). this is my first time using ojb. Meanwhile I get aware of what ojb can