..Frank
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Charles Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. September 2006 16:09
An: OJB Users List
Betreff: RE: Support of database views
Well, that's my guess...
> -Original Message-
> From: Hiller, Frank RD-AS2 [mailto:[EMAIL
It was a good guess then !
Glad I could help,
Charles.
> -Original Message-
> From: Hiller, Frank RD-AS2 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 September 2006 15:26
> To: OJB Users List
> Subject: AW: Support of database views
>
> Yes, it works.
> Th
Yes, it works.
Thank youFrank
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Charles Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. September 2006 16:09
An: OJB Users List
Betreff: RE: Support of database views
Well, that's my guess...
> -Original Message
Well, that's my guess...
> -Original Message-
> From: Hiller, Frank RD-AS2 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 September 2006 15:08
> To: OJB Users List
> Subject: AW: Support of database views
>
> Ok, I see.
> Setting
> class="org.apache.ojb.brok
Ok, I see.
Setting
on the specific table (that actually is a view) resolves the problem?
Frank
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Charles Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. September 2006 16:04
An: OJB Users List
Betreff: RE: Support of database views
Yes, but all
eing very clear.
> -Original Message-
> From: Hiller, Frank RD-AS2 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 September 2006 14:52
> To: OJB Users List
> Subject: AW: Support of database views
>
> I do not expect to automatically update the object in cache
> representing t
the old value.
This confuses me a little.
Best regards,
Frank
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Charles Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. September 2006 15:23
An: OJB Users List
Betreff: RE: Support of database views
No, it's not really a bug;
Let's sa
the org.apache.ojb.broker.cache.ObjectCacheEmptyImpl in object-cache element
for the class in the repostory.xml)
Cheers,
Charles.
> -Original Message-
> From: Hiller, Frank RD-AS2 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 September 2006 14:09
> To: OJB Users List
> Su
Users List
Betreff: AW: Support of database views
Hi Vasily,
using the view as a table (following your recommendation) shows a strange
behaviour.
When a field in a table is updated and the matching object returns the correct
new value the object related to the view (spanning two tables ) still
treff: Re: Support of database views
Hi Frank,
We used to work with views without any issue, just put view's name as "table"
attribute in "class-descriptor". However, you will only be able to read objects
from that view.
Regards,
Vasily
On 9/11/06, Hiller, Frank RD
Good idea, works fine.
Thank you..Frank
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Vasily Ivanov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. September 2006 01:19
An: OJB Users List
Betreff: Re: Support of database views
Hi Frank,
We used to work with views without any issue
Short question: I couldn't find a functionality to deal with database
views (create view...) within OJB.
Is there a reason for that?
Is the answer "use ReportQuery".
Thank you,
Frank
Confidentiality note:
The information in this email and any attachment may contain confidentia
Short question: I couldn't find a functionality to deal with database
views (create view...) within OJB.
Is there a reason for that?
Is the answer "use ReportQuery".
Thank you,
Frank
Confidentiality note:
The information in this email and any attachment may contain c
that
uniquely identify one row in the view.
cheers,
Thomas
Manjula Venugopal (FS) wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Read your messages about accessing database views using OJB.
I have defined a view in Oracle database. And generated Java class
using "reverse-db" tool.
When i use P
dated, set
access="readonly" in the field-descriptors.
cheers,
Thomas
If you have
any other thoughts on how to implement database views, that would be
appreciated also. Thank you.
Peter
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hello Peter
I am using database views in my project without any problem.
you have to map your object to your databaseview like you do it with any table
-Mensaje original-
De: Peter Costa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 7:16 PM
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED
I was wondering if it is possible to map a class in the
repository_user.xml to a database view. If it is possible do I just put
the view name in the table column on the class descriptor? If you have
any other thoughts on how to implement database views, that would be
appreciated also. Thank you
Hi Raymond,
Raymond Barlow wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to get a general opinion on what is the best practise for using
database views or not. I'm currently converting a system that has a
number of views. Some of the views use other views to build up reporting
type information. I w
Hi all,
I'd like to get a general opinion on what is the best practise for using
database views or not. I'm currently converting a system that has a
number of views. Some of the views use other views to build up reporting
type information. I would think that in a totally clean cl
19 matches
Mail list logo
