Re: FEATURE REQUEST : specify foreign-key-attribute to use with colle ction descriptors instead of using primary of container class

hi roger, when considering this feature we should not only focus on 1:n collections but on any relationships. i'd prefer to introduce feature for ojb 1.1 an not try to integrate it into 1.0.x wdyt ? jakob Jakob Braeuchi schrieb: hi roger, imo this feature could be useful in some real life scenar

Re: FEATURE REQUEST : specify foreign-key-attribute to use with colle ction descriptors instead of using primary of container class

hi roger, imo this feature could be useful in some real life scenarios; even without an intermediate class like Acl in your example. but i'd prefer to extend the inverse-foreignkey (called "referencing" in the following snippet, but this is just a temp name). if the referencing attribute is mis

FEATURE REQUEST : specify foreign-key-attribute to use with colle ction descriptors instead of using primary of container class

Hi guys, i've got a question. I am using 1.0-rc6. Currently, using a collection descriptor, you specify the inverse-foreignkey attribute on the items of the collection, and these attributes are matched with the value of the primary key of the object that contains the collection. However, cons