itself, it sure made
our wrapper classes nicer.
-Andrew
> -Original Message-
> From: Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 3:14 PM
> To: OJB Users List
> Subject: Re: OJB 1.0.x and Java5.0
>
> Let me expand my ide
I'll try that example with OJB...
Thanks,
Edson Richter
Thomas Dudziak escreveu:
On 8/8/05, Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let me expand my idea (sorry if I get boring).
I have a User object. Each user has a LoginHour list. So, using JDK 5.0
could I declare
p
On 8/8/05, Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let me expand my idea (sorry if I get boring).
> I have a User object. Each user has a LoginHour list. So, using JDK 5.0
> could I declare
>
> public class User {
> private String username;
> private String password;
> p
Let me expand my idea (sorry if I get boring).
I have a User object. Each user has a LoginHour list. So, using JDK 5.0
could I declare
public class User {
private String username;
private String password;
private List loginHours;
public void setUsername(String newUsername) {...}
public Str
On 8/8/05, Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone has an example about how could OJB be used with Generics? This
> will not affect the class-mapping descriptor?
Since Java generics will be compiled to non-generic bytecode, it does
not really affect classloading etc. Hen
Anyone has an example about how could OJB be used with Generics? This
will not affect the class-mapping descriptor?
Richter
Tino Schöllhorn escreveu:
Hi,
we are currently thinking of moving from JDK1.4.2 to Java 5.0.x. The
most interesting part of new Java Editition is the use of Generics
I'am using OJB with java 5, and haven't noticed any issues with it,
because of runtime type erasure i guess. Except for the xdoclet module
that was patched i think to be able to parse Java 5 classes.
Jean-Yves
Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On 8/7/05, Tino Schöllhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/7/05, Tino Schöllhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we are currently thinking of moving from JDK1.4.2 to Java 5.0.x. The
> most interesting part of new Java Editition is the use of Generics which
> will lead to a much better understandable code-base. I have a few
> questions, which might be an
Yes we use Java 5.0 in our Crisfield product, but we have not migrated our
OJB projects to it yet.
On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Tino Schöllhorn wrote:
Hi,
we are currently thinking of moving from JDK1.4.2 to Java 5.0.x. The most
interesting part of new Java Editition is the use of Generi
Hi,
we are currently thinking of moving from JDK1.4.2 to Java 5.0.x. The
most interesting part of new Java Editition is the use of Generics which
will lead to a much better understandable code-base. I have a few
questions, which might be answered by someone of the OJB community:
- Are there
10 matches
Mail list logo
